Argumentation Frameworks – A Brief Review

Authors

  • Ahmed T. Sadiq University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Hasanen S. Abdulah Iraqi Ministry of Communications, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Adnan Taher Kareem University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v18i02.28023

Keywords:

argumentation frameworks, attack, support

Abstract


The main aim of this article is to provide a short review of the most important argumentation frameworks (AFs) systems being used. This paper presents the overall thought of unique argumentation, featuring the work way of these theoretical systems in the argumentation interaction and surveys the first Dung structures. It introduces how these systems give acceptable arguments by focused on the argumentation frameworks structures and how to deal with the arguments and the basic rules to give the result. Finally, it surveys the idea of theoretical rationalistic structures, quite possibly the broadest frameworks for dynamic argumentation, and gives a short description of several argumentation frameworks that are more famous.

Author Biographies

Ahmed T. Sadiq, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

Computer Sciences Department,

Hasanen S. Abdulah, Iraqi Ministry of Communications, Baghdad, Iraq.

Iraqi Ministry of Communications, Baghdad, Iraq.

Adnan Taher Kareem, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-16

How to Cite

T. Sadiq, A., S. Abdulah, H., & Taher Kareem, A. (2022). Argumentation Frameworks – A Brief Review. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), 18(02), pp. 55–70. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v18i02.28023

Issue

Section

Papers