Integration of Augmented Reality in Hybrid Learning: Student Perceptions and Acceptance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i03.58887Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Hybrid Learning, Student Perception, Technology Acceptance, Learning MotivationAbstract
This study aims to explore students’ perceptions and acceptance levels of the use of augmented reality (AR) in hybrid learning, focusing on aspects of usefulness, attitudes, benefits, and perceived limitations. This study is useful in providing insights into the potential of AR as a transformative learning medium that can increase student motivation, understanding, and engagement, while also generating pedagogical recommendations to support more effective hybrid learning implementation. The research method used was a descriptive approach involving 75 students from the Faculty of Engineering, Makassar State University, who had at least four months of experience in using AR. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, then analyzed to explore perceptions, attitudes, benefits, and shortcomings of using AR in the context of hybrid learning. The results showed that students had positive perceptions and a high level of acceptance of AR, as indicated by an average acceptance score of 4.12 and a perception score of 3.96. The most significant benefits were an increase in understanding of abstract concepts (M = 4.32), an increase in self-directed learning motivation (M = 4.36), and more engaging interactivity (M = 4.41). However, several shortcomings were also found, such as the potential for excessive dependence that triggers passive learning, technical limitations, concerns about data privacy, and the risk of decreased creativity and originality. The conclusion of this study is that the integration of augmented reality in hybrid learning is worth developing because it has been proven to improve students’ understanding, motivation, and collaboration. However, its implementation needs to be supported by pedagogical strategies such as problem-based learning, scaffolding, and critical reflection so that students do not only rely on instant visualization but also continue to hone their creativity, critical thinking, and independent learning.
References
[1] Reilly, J., & Dede, C. (2018). Augmented Reality in Education. Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning.
[2] Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). Meta-analysis of the impact of Augmented Reality on students’ learning gains. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001
[3] Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta‐analysis of the effects of augmented reality technologies in interactive learning environments (2012–2022). Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(2), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22628
[4] Kabra, K., Mane, H., Falke, A., Daitkar, S., Saphalika, S., & Barik, JSPMs Bhivarabai. (2025). Augmented Reality in Education. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM).
[5] Dhar, P., Rocks, T., Samarasinghe, R. M., Stephenson, G., & Smith, C. M. (2021). Augmented reality in medical education: students’ experiences and learning outcomes. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953
[6] Hincapié, M., Diaz, C., Valencia-Arias, A., Contero, M., & Güemes-Castorena, D. (2021). Educational applications of augmented reality: A bibliometric study. Comput. Electr. Eng., 93, 107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107289
[7] Sirakaya, M., & Sirakaya, D. A. (2020). Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
[8] Koumpouros, Y. (2024). Revealing the true potential and prospects of augmented reality in education. Smart Learn. Environ., 11, 1.
[9] Ironsi, C. S. (2024). Examining perceptions of utilizing augmented reality in hybrid learning environment: instructors and students perspectives. Foresight. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-09-2023-0202
[10] Pujiastuti, H., & Haryadi, R. (2023). Hybrid learning impact with augmented reality to improve higher order thinking skills of students. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(12), 1-10.
[11] Jiang, H., Zhu, D., Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., & Jin, W. (2025). Virtual reality and augmented reality-supported K-12 STEM learning: trends, advantages and challenges. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12345-6
[12] Rossano, V., Lanzilotti, R., Cazzolla, A., & Roselli, T. (2020). Augmented Reality to Support Geometry Learning. IEEE Access, 8, 123456-123467. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974931
[13] Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5224.
[14] Mansour, N., Aras, C., Staarman, J. K., & Alotaibi, S. B. M. (2024). Embodied learning of science concepts through augmented reality technology. Educ. Inf. Technol.
[15] Algerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics, 12(19), 4256. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12194256
[16] Scavarelli, A., Arya, A., & Teather, R. J. (2020). Virtual reality and augmented reality in social learning spaces: a literature review. Virtual Reality, 24, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00444-4
[17] Maas, M., & Hughes, J. (2020). Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: a review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210
[18] Li, M., & Liu, L. (2022). Students' perceptions of augmented reality integrated into a mobile learning environment. Libr. Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2021-0362
[19] Saputra, D. (2022). Perception of elementary school teachers and students on digital augmented reality learning media. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 14(1), 93-102.
[20] Uymaz, P., & Uymaz, A. O. (2022). Assessing acceptance of augmented reality in nursing education. PLoS ONE, 17(2), e0263937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263937
[21] Mailizar, M., & Johar, R. (2021). Examining Students’ Intention to Use Augmented Reality in a Project-Based Geometry Learning Environment. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14213a
[22] Shyr, W.-J., Wei, B.-L., & Liang, Y.-C. (2024). Evaluating Students’ Acceptance Intention of Augmented Reality in Automation Systems Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 16(3), 1234.
[23] Salar, R., Arici, F., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. (2020). A Model for Augmented Reality Immersion Experiences of University Students Studying in Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29, 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09823-5
[24] Yanto, D. T. P., Ganefri, S., Sukardi, J. P. Y., Kurani, R., & Muslim. (2024). Engineering Students' Acceptance of Augmented Reality Technology Integrated with E-Worksheet in The Laboratory Learning. Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng., 20(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.41013
[25] Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., Rocio, V., Butkienė, R., & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 17(3), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756
[26] Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., Yitmen, I., & Homod, R. (2023). Enhancing Student Engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s Power in Hybrid Education—A Review Analysis. Education Sciences, 13(6), 587.
[27] Topping, K., Douglas, W., Robertson, D. P., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), e3364. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353
[28] Khatib, J., Sulaiman, D., Padang, I., Fransisca, M., & Saputri, R. P. (2023). Digital Technology’s Implementation in Hybrid Learning at Higher Educational Level. Indonesian Journal of Computer Science, 12(2), 2345. https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v12i3.3213
[29] Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2019). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 22, 269–290.
[30] Li, K., Wong, B., Kwan, R., Chan, H. T., Wu, M., & Cheung, S. (2023). Evaluation of Hybrid Learning and Teaching Practices: The Perspective of Academics. Sustainability, 15(7), 6123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086780
[31] Wahyudin, A., Nashirudin, H., Furqon, M., Rohmad, M., & Choironi, M. A. (2023). Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning Using Streaming Technology in Education. International Journal of Instructional Technology, 6(2), 123.
[32] Hopkins, M., Lin, M.-H., & Nariswari, A. (2023). Collaborative technology in a hybrid learning context: exploring feeling at ease and perceived learning among college students. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(10), 2101–2117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2022-0477
[33] Badilla-Quintana, M. G., Sepúlveda-Valenzuela, E., & Salazar Arias, M. (2020). Augmented Reality as a Sustainable Technology to Improve Academic Achievement in Students with and without Special Educational Needs. Sustainability, 12(19), 8116.
[34] Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Fernández Martinez, M. M. (2019). Educational Uses of Augmented Reality (AR): Experiences in Educational Science. Sustainability, 11(18), 4990.
[35] Park, S., & Yun, H. (2023). Relationships between students’ affective experiences and technology acceptance in augmented reality design training in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development.
[36] Taha, S., Abulibdeh, E., Qunais, J., Skaik, H., Alghazo, E. M., Daoud, S., & Bouzenoun, A. (2023). Exploring the Utilization of Augmented Reality in Higher Education Perceptions of Media and Communication Students. Emerging Science Journal, 7(SI), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-SIED2-016
[37] Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008
[38] Liu, L. (2025). Enhancing educational training and learning outcomes through a hybrid experience created by integrating augmented reality and virtual reality technologies. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241312994
[39] Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
[40] Liu, X.-W., et al. (2022). Research on Training Effectiveness of Professional Maintenance Personnel Based on Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Technology. Sustainability, 14(21), 14786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114351
[41] Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5224.
[42] Sriadhi, S., Hamid, A., Sitompul, H., & Restu, R. (2022). Effectiveness of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Media for Engineering-Physics Teaching. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 17(5), 204-214. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i05.28613
[43] Shen, S., et al. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption and usage of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality applications in tourism education within the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 31, 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100373
[44] Xi, N. et al. (2022). Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 1301–1322.
[45] Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165660
[46] Mazzuco, A., Krassmann, A., Reategui, E., & Gomes, R. S. (2022). A systematic review of augmented reality in chemistry education. Review of Education, 10(1), e3362.
[47] Baashar, Y., et al. (2021). Effectiveness of Using Augmented Reality for Training in the Medical Professions: Meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games, 9(3), e32715.
[48] Barsom, E., Graafland, M., & Schijven, M. (2016). Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surgical Endoscopy, 30, 4174–4183.
[49] Sakr, A., & Abdullah, T. (2024). Virtual, augmented reality and learning analytics impact on learners, and educators: A systematic review. Educ. Inf. Technol., 29, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12602-5
[50] Suresh, D., et al. (2022). The Role of Augmented Reality in Surgical Training: A Systematic Review. Surgical Innovation, 29(6), 823–836.
[51] Liu, L. (2025). Enhancing educational training and learning outcomes through a hybrid experience created by integrating augmented reality and virtual reality technologies. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978241312994
[52] Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2021). A Systematic Review of AR and VR Enhanced Language Learning. Sustainability, 13(8), 4422.
[53] Setiawaty, S., Lukman, I. R., Imanda, R., Sudirman, S., & Rauzatuzzikrina, R. (2024). Integrating of Mobile Augmented Reality Applications Through Inquiry Learning to Improve Students’ Science Process Skills and Concept Mastery. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.48891
[54] Wang, Y.-H. (2017). Using augmented reality to support a software editing course for college students. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 33(5), 532-546.
[55] Zhang, W., & Wang, Z. (2021). Theory and Practice of VR/AR in K-12 Science Education—A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(21), 12095.
[56] Perifanou, M. A., Economides, A., & Nikou, S. (2022). Teachers' Views on Integrating Augmented Reality in Education: Needs, Opportunities, Challenges and Recommendations. Future Internet, 15(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
[57] Maulidah, G., & Christyodetaputri, J. H. (2025). Beyond Engagement: Integrating AR and VR for Inclusive Learning in K–Higher Education. Sinergi International Journal of Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.61194/education.v3i1.630
[58] Czerkawski, B. C., & Berti, M. (2021). Learning experience design for augmented reality. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2429
[59] Abdullah, F., Kassim, M. H., Razak, M. R. A., & Sanusi, A. N. Z. (2019). Interfaced environment for the teaching of subjects on building construction and materials: showcases of two experimentations.
[60] Sun, J., Ye, S.-L., Yu, S.-J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Effects of Wearable Hybrid AR/VR Learning Material on High School Students’ Situational Interest, Engagement, and Learning Performance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31, 1-15.
[61] Hung, Y., Chen, C.-H., & Huang, S.-W. (2017). Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: a study of different teaching materials. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 33(5), 532-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12173
[62] Oh, S., So, H., & Gaydos, M. (2017). Hybrid Augmented Reality for Participatory Learning: The Hidden Efficacy of Multi-User Game-Based Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(4), 1-13.
[63] Bölek, K. A., de Jong, G., & Henssen, D. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 11, 3067.
[64] Garzón, J., Kinshuk, Baldiris, S., Gutierrez, J., & Pavón, J. (2020). How do pedagogical approaches affect the impact of augmented reality on education? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100334
[65] Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2021). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617
[66] Poupard, M., Larrue, F., Sauzéon, H., & Tricot, A. (2024). A systematic review of immersive technologies for education: Learning performance, cognitive load and intrinsic motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1234–1256.
[67] Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Load Theory (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[68] Chen, M., Chang, Y., & Chuang, M. (2021). Virtual reality application influences cognitive load-mediated creativity components and creative performance in engineering design. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1501–1518.
[69] Mokmin, N. A. M., Su, H. J., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2023). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students on a design course. Journal of Computers in Education, 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00270-2
[70] Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. (2016). Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
[71] Skulmowski, A. (2023). The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09818-1
[72] Hernandez Sibo, I. P., Gomez Celis, D. A., & Liou, S. (2024). Exploring the Landscape of Cognitive Load in Creative Thinking: a Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review.
[73] Gusti Putu, G., Buditjahjanto, A., & Irfansyah, J. (2023). Augmented reality on students' academic achievement viewed from the creative thinking level. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(2), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1813
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mantasia, Hamidah Suryani, Sutarsi Suhaeb, Indra Sukma, Hendra Jaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
