Technology Acceptance Model in Indonesian Education
A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i06.60303Keywords:
technology acceptance model, education, learning, systematic literature review, IndonesiaAbstract
The technology acceptance model (TAM) has demonstrated its value as a framework for assessing the determinants that shape users’ willingness to embrace new technologies. Nevertheless, a noticeable empirical gap remains regarding how TAM is currently implemented in Indonesia’s educational landscape. This study employs a systematic literature review (SLR) to consolidate and depict the present trajectory of TAM-related scholarship in Indonesian education. In total, 119 scholarly articles were retrieved from Sinta, the official journal indexing system of the Republic of Indonesia. The findings indicate that TAM was first introduced into Indonesian educational research in 2010. The learning management system (LMS) emerges as the most extensively assessed platform. The predominant study participants are university students, particularly those enrolled in vocational and engineering programs. The majority of TAM-related articles appear in journals accredited at the Sinta 2 level. Central Java accounts for the largest concentration of studies, and self-efficacy is the most commonly examined external construct within the TAM model.
References
[1] S. Hajian, “Transfer of Learning and Teaching: A Review of Transfer Theories and Effective Instructional Practices,” IAFOR J. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 93–111, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.1.06.
[2] K. Resch and I. Schrittesser, “Using The Service-Learning Approach to Bridge The Gap Between Theory and Practice in Teacher Education,” Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1118–1132, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1882053.
[3] S. Le Men, “The Birth of the Children’s Museum and Visual Education: From Comenius to Madame Genlis,” Image Narrat., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 22–42, 2023.
[4] S. A. Ionescu and V. Diaconita, “Transforming Financial Decision-Making: The Interplay of AI, Cloud Computing and Advanced Data Management Technologies,” Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1–19, 2023, https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2023.6.5735.
[5] G. Janschitz and M. Penker, “How digital are ‘digital natives’ actually? Developing an instrument to measure the degree of digitalisation of university students – the DDS-Index,” BMS Bull. Sociol. Methodol. Bull. Methodol. Sociol., vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 127–159, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/07591063211061760.
[6] M. Anwar et al., “Blended Learning Based Project In Electronics Engineering Education Courses: A Learning Innovation after the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 107–122, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i14.33307.
[7] M. I. Ciolacu, B. Mihailescu, T. Rachbauer, C. Hansen, C. G. Amza, and P. Svasta, “Fostering Engineering Education 4.0 Paradigm Facing the Pandemic and VUCA World,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 217, pp. 177–186, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.213.
[8] A. ElSayary, “The impact of a professional upskilling training programme on developing teachers’ digital competence,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1154–1166, Aug. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/JCAL.12788.
[9] A. B. Rinekso and A. B. Muslim, “Synchronous online discussion: teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic,” JEES (Journal English Educ. Soc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 2020, https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.646.
[10] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q., pp. 319–340, 1989.
[11] B. Santoso and Edwin Zusrony, “Analisis Persepsi Pengguna Aplikasi Payment Berbasis Fintech Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam),” J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Komun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 49–54, 2020, https://doi.org/10.51903/jtikp.v11i1.150.
[12] N. Marangunić and A. Granić, “Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 81–95, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
[13] A. Granić and N. Marangunić, “Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 2572–2593, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
[14] S. A. Salloum, A. Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, M. Al-Emran, A. Abdel Monem, and K. Shaalan, “Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 128445–128462, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467.
[15] D. Marikyan, S. Papagiannidis, and G. Stewart, “Technology acceptance research: Meta-analysis,” J. Inf. Sci., 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515231191177.
[16] C. C. Voigt and T. Kingston, Bats in the Anthropocene : Conservation of Bats in a Changing World. Springer Cham, London/NY. pp. 600. 2016.
[17] I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, “Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes,” Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–33, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779943000116.
[18] J. M. Feldman and J. G. Lynch, “Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 421–435, 1988, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421.
[19] O. F. Borda, P. Reason, and H. Bradbury, “Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges,” Handb. action Res. Particip. Inq. Pract., pp. 27–37, 2006.
[20] Y. Tian, T. J. Chan, N. M. Suki, and M. A. Kasim, “Moderating Role of Perceived Trust and Perceived Service Quality on Consumers’ Use Behavior of Alipay e-wallet System: The Perspectives of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2023, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5276406.
[21] G. Pizzi, V. Vannucci, V. Mazzoli, and R. Donvito, “I, chatbot! the impact of anthropomorphism and gaze direction on willingness to disclose personal information and behavioral intentions,” Psychol. Mark., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1372–1387, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21813.
[22] M. Rukhiran, S. Wong-In, and P. Netinant, “User Acceptance Factors Related to Biometric Recognition Technologies of Examination Attendance in Higher Education: TAM Model,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043092.
[23] H. Hidayat et al., “Analysis of Computational Thinking Skill Through Technology Acceptance Model Approach Using Augmented Reality in Electronics Engineering Education,” TEM J., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1423–1431, 2024, https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM132-56.
[24] H. Hidayat et al., “The Influence of Augmented Reality Mobile App on Electronics Engineering Students’ Self-Competence,” TEM J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2310–2318, 2024, https://doi.org/10.18421/tem133-58.
[25] H. N. Do, W. Shih, and Q. A. Ha, “Effects of mobile augmented reality apps on impulse buying behavior: An investigation in the tourism field,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 8, p. e04667, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04667.
[26] Y. Zhang and F. Wang, “Developments and Trends in Flow Research Over 40 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Collabra Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.92948.
[27] F. K. Dewi and H. Hidayat, “Analisis Computational Thinking Skill yang Mempengaruhi Penggunaan Augmented Reality dengan Pendekatan TAM,” Voteteknika (Vocational Tek. Elektron. dan Inform., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2023.
[28] V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies,” Manage. Sci., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186–204, 2000, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
[29] C. L. Lee, R. Strong, G. Briers, T. Murphrey, N. Rajan, and S. Rampold, “Factors predicting innovation-decisions: The effects of performance expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions on U.S. Extension’s promotion of precision agriculture technologies,” NJAS Impact Agric. Life Sci., vol. 96, no. 1, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/27685241.2024.2420111.
[30] M. Azarian, H. Yu, A. T. Shiferaw, and T. K. Stevik, “Do We Perform Systematic Literature Review Right? A Scientific Mapping and Methodological Assessment,” Logistics, vol. 7, no. 4, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7040089.
[31] R. Rahmat, I. Harahap, Z. M. Nawawi, and A. K. Z. Hrp, “Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Analyzing the Important Role of Population and Human Resource Development,” J. Mantik, vol. 7, no. 4, 2024.
[32] W. Mengist, T. Soromessa, and G. Legese, “Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research,” MethodsX, vol. 7, p. 100777, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777.
[33] I. K. Raharjana, D. Siahaan, and C. Fatichah, “User Stories and Natural Language Processing: A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 53811–53826, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070606.
[34] F. J. García-Peñalvo, “Developing robust state-of-the-art reports: Systematic Literature Reviews,” Educ. Knowl. Soc., vol. 23, p. E28600, 2022, https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.28600.
[35] A. Shabrina, H. F. Mustika, Y. Yaniasih, A. Yoganingrum, and J. Lee, “A Comparison of Scholarly Journal Evaluation Between Indonesia and South Korea,” Libr. Philos. Pract., 2021.
[36] L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, “Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 1, no. June, p. 100012, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012.
[37] C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, and M. Koole, “Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education,” Postdigital Sci. Educ., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 715–742, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1.
[38] X. Xie, K. Siau, and F. F. H. Nah, “COVID-19 pandemic–online education in the new normal and the next normal,” J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 175–187, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884.
[39] N. Chaudhary, V. Patel, C. J. Vidani, C. Author, and C. J. Vidani cleverminds, “A Review of Non-Technical Training Programmes Conducted by Corporate Trainers for IT Companies,” Int. J. Manag. Anal., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–110, 2023.
[40] O. M. Prabowo, E. Mulyana, I. G. B. B. Nugraha, and S. H. Supangkat, “Cognitive City Platform as Digital Public Infrastructure for Developing a Smart, Sustainable and Resilient City in Indonesia,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, no. September, pp. 120157–120178, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327305.
[41] K. Okoye et al., Impact of digital technologies upon teaching and learning in higher education in Latin America: an outlook on the reach, barriers, and bottlenecks, vol. 28, no. 2. Springer US, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11214-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fitrika Kumala Dewi, Hendra Hidayat, Dedy Irfan, Giatman, Hansi Effendi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
