Detecting Health Misinformation Using Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i10.61955Keywords:
medical-demographic security, health misinformation detection, retrieval-augmented verification, claim decomposition, natural language inference, large language models, knowledge base constructionAbstract
Misinformation is common in online media, including in health-related content. Such misinformation constitutes a significant risk to the medical-demographic security of the population. Many people actively seek medical information online without the ability to verify its trustworthiness. This paper proposes a modular system for automated detection of misinformation in medical content based on retrieval-augmented verification. In the pipeline, input articles are summarized and decomposed into atomic claims. Each claim is then vectorized using dense embeddings (BGE-Large-en-v1.5) and matched against a self-constructed knowledge base via cosine similarity to retrieve evidence. Retrieved evidence is verified using large language model (LLM)- based natural language inference (NLI) and aggregated into article-level predictions through a scoring function. The LLM used in the system is the open-source LLaMA-3.1 model with eight billion parameters. Together with a self-contained knowledge base, this represents a deliberately constrained environment. Such a setup isolates the contribution of the presented architecture from its dependency on external knowledge sources and LLMs with large parameter counts. The system achieved 98.4% accuracy and a macro F1 of 0.978 at 79.0% coverage on the evaluated datasets (DETERRENT and CONSTRAINT). This demonstrates that, even under resource constraints, the correct pipeline architecture enables high-precision misinformation detection on medical content. It also represents a clear improvement over the ablation experiment, which used the same model without the proposed pipeline and achieved an F1 of only 0.773.
References
[1] V. Mammadaliyev and V. Shahbazov, “Disinformation detection in the medical domain: Current approaches, limitations, and future directions,” Problems of Information Society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2026, doi: 10.25045/jpis.v17.i1.09.
[2] World Health Organization, “Infodemics and misinformation negatively affect people’s health behaviours, new WHO review finds.” https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/01-09-2022-infodemics-and-misinformation-negatively-affect-people-s-health-behaviours--new-who-review-finds, 2022.
[3] M. M. Ferreira Cáceres et al., “The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic,” AIMS Public Health, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 262–277, 2022, doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022018.
[4] S. Loomba, A. de Figueiredo, S. J. Piatek, K. de Graaf, and H. J. Larson, “Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA,” Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 337–348, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1.
[5] H. I. Okagbue, P. E. Oguntunde, S. A. Bishop, E. C. M. Obasi, A. A. Opanuga, and O. P. Ogundile, “Review on the reliability of medical contents on YouTube,” International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 83–99, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijoe.v16i01.11558.
[6] L. Cui, H. Seo, M. Tabar, F. Ma, S. Wang, and D. Lee, “DETERRENT: Knowledge guided graph attention network for detecting healthcare misinformation,” in Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2020, pp. 492–502. doi: 10.1145/3394486.3403092.
[7] P. Patwa et al., “Fighting an infodemic: COVID-19 fake news dataset,” in Combating online hostile posts in regional languages during emergency situation, Springer, 2021, pp. 21–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-73696-5_3.
[8] C. Chen and K. Shu, “Combating misinformation in the age of LLMs: Opportunities and challenges,” AI Magazine, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 354–368, 2024, doi: 10.1002/aaai.12188.
[9] E. Papageorgiou, C. Chronis, I. Varlamis, and Y. Himeur, “A survey on the use of large language models (LLMs) in fake news,” Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 298, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16080298.
[10] P. Lewis et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, pp. 9459–9474.
[11] H. Li, J. Huang, M. Ji, Y. Yang, and R. An, “Use of retrieval-augmented large language model for COVID-19 fact-checking: Development and usability study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 27, p. e66098, 2025, doi: 10.2196/66098.
[12] D. Quelle and A. Bovet, “The perils and promises of fact-checking with large language models,” Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, p. 1341697, 2024, doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1341697.
[13] S. Min et al., “FActScore: Fine-grained atomic evaluation of factual precision in long form text generation,” in Proceedings of the 2023 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 2023, pp. 12076–12100.
[14] Y. Wang et al., “When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, p. 73, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02008-z.
[15] Y. Gao et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997, 2023.
[16] R. Upadhyay and M. Viviani, “Enhancing health information retrieval with RAG by prioritizing topical relevance and factual accuracy,” Discover Computing, vol. 28, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10791-025-09505-5.
[17] C. N. Hang, P.-D. Yu, and C. W. Tan, “TrumorGPT: Graph-based retrieval-augmented large language model for fact-checking,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 3148–3162, 2025, doi: 10.1109/tai.2025.3567369.
[18] Y. Bai and K. Fu, “A large language model-based fake news detection framework with RAG fact-checking,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on big data, 2024, pp. 8617–8619. doi: 10.1109/bigdata62323.2024.10826000.
[19] T. Hossain, R. L. Logan, A. Ugarte, Y. Matsubara, S. D. Young, and S. Singh, “COVIDLies: Detecting COVID-19 misinformation on social media,” in Proceedings of the 1st workshop on NLP for COVID-19 at EMNLP 2020, 2020. doi: 10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcovid19-2.11.
[20] J. Ma, W. Gao, S. Joty, and K.-F. Wong, “Sentence-level evidence embedding for claim verification with hierarchical attention networks,” in Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, 2019, pp. 2561–2571. doi: 10.18653/v1/p19-1244.
[21] N. Muennighoff, N. Tazi, L. Magne, and N. Reimers, “MTEB: Massive text embedding benchmark,” in Proceedings of the 17th conference of the european chapter of the association for computational linguistics, 2023, pp. 2014–2037. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023.eacl-main.148.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Masuma Mammadova, Vagif Mammadaliyev, Vusal Shahbazov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

