A Deep Learning–Based Multi-Source Sensor Data Fusion Model for Real-Time Disaster Prediction and Healthcare Risk Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v22i08.62334Keywords:
Multi-source sensor fusion, deep learning, disaster prediction, healthcare risk assessment, spatio-temporal attention, IoT, cross-modal learning, real-time inference, edge computingAbstract
Simultaneous natural disaster prediction and healthcare risk assessment of affected populations is a complex problem in modern intelligent systems because the data resulting from diverse sensor modalities are often heterogeneous, high-dimensional, and suffer temporal misalignment. Current disaster forecasting and clinical health risk monitoring methods consider them as separate domains, neglecting their inherent spatio-temporal interdependencies during crisis events. We present a novel Multi-Source Deep Fusion Network (MS-DFNet) that jointly learns from heterogeneous sensor streams, including seismic accelerometers, meteorological sensors, environmental IoT nodes and wearable physiological monitors in a single, multi-scale, hierarchical architecture. The latest form of intelligent systems, one such challenge is managing prediction of natural disasters and healthcare risk assessments for populations in parallel due to data from multimodal sensors being heterogeneous and high-dimensional with potential temporal misalignment. Current methods treat disaster predictions and epidemiological risk monitoring as separate processes, without leveraging their inherent correlations in time and space during crisis events. In this paper, we introduce MS-DFNet, a new MS-DFNet that operates on heterogeneous sensor streams such as seismic accelerometers, meteorological sensors and environmental IoT nodes or wearables’ physiological monitors within a unique hierarchical architecture. The proposed framework has three main contributions: (1) a Cross-Modal Temporal Attention (CMTA) mechanism that adaptively aligns and emphasises heterogeneous time-series signals; (2) a Dual-Task Cascade Prediction Head (DTCPH) for simultaneously generating both disaster risk probability maps along with individual healthcare risk scores; and (3) an Adaptive Sensor Dropout Regularisation (ASDR) strategy to improve the model robustness against sensor failure and missing data, which is an actual need in disaster situations. MS-DFNet achieves an average disaster prediction F1-score of 93.7% and healthcare risk AUC-ROC of 0.961, surpassing stateof-the-art baselines by 4.2–8.9% on all major metrics across extensive experiments over four benchmark datasets (i.e., STEAD seismic, CAMELS hydro-meteorological, PhysioNet MIMIC-III and a newly curated multi-hazard IoT corpus). The resulting model inference can be executed end-to-end in less than 38 ms where the required embedded edge hardware is available, indicating real-time practicality. These findings validate that MS-DFNet is an important step toward unified situational-awareness systems for smart cities, emergency response and remote healthcare infrastructure.
References
[1] UNDRR. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, 2022.
[2] Kouadio, I. K., et al. (2022). Infectious diseases following natural disasters: Prevention and control measures. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy, 10(1), 95–104.
[3] Alam, F., Mehmood, R., Katib, I., Albogami, N. N., & Albeshri, A. (2017). Data fusion and IoT for smart ubiquitous environments: A survey. IEEE Access, 5, 9533–9554.
[4] Abdalzaher, M. S., Krichen, M., Yiltas-Kaplan, D., Ben Dhaou, I., & Adoni, W. Y. H. (2023). Early detection of earthquakes using IoT and cloud infrastructure: A survey. Sustainability, 15(15), 11713.
[5] LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.
[6] Litjens, G., et al. (2017). A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60–88.
[7] Mousavi, S. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2023). Machine learning in earthquake seismology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 51, 105–129.
[8] Phalguna Krishna, E. S., et al. (2023). Hybrid deep learning model with enhanced sunflower optimization for flood and earthquake detection. Heliyon, 9(10), e21172.
[9] Acosta, J. N., et al. (2022). Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review. npj Digital Medicine, 5, 171.
[10] Shahid, N., et al. (2023). Multimodal information fusion for smart healthcare: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10712-7.
[11] Reid, C. E., et al. (2019). Associations between respiratory health and ozone and fine particulate matter during a wildfire event. Environment International, 129, 291–298.
[12] Ghamisi, P., et al. (2019). Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 7(1), 6–39.
[13] Broer, A. A., Benedictus, R., & Zarouchas, D. (2022). The need for multi-sensor data fusion in structural health monitoring of composite aircraft structures. Aerospace, 9(4), 183.
[14] Verbert, K., Babuška, R., & De Schutter, B. (2017). Bayesian and Dempster–Shafer reasoning for knowledge-based fault diagnosis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 60, 136–150.
[15] Arsalan, M., et al. (2022). Sensor data fusion based on deep learning for computer vision applications and medical applications. Sensors, 22(20), 8058.
[16] Kumar, D., et al. (2025). Hybrid deep learning for IoT-based health monitoring with physiological event extraction. Digital Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251234567.
[17] Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.
[18] Dirgová Luptáková, I., Kubovčík, M., & Pospíchal, J. (2022). Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition with transformer model. Sensors, 22(5), 1911.
[19] Wang, C.-Y., Huang, T.-C., & Wu, Y.-M. (2022). Using LSTM neural networks for onsite earthquake early warning. Seismological Society of America, 93, 814–826.
[20] Li, Z., et al. (2025). Scalable intermediate-term earthquake forecasting with multimodal fusion neural networks (SafeNet). Scientific Reports, 15, 9827.
[21] Huang, H., Wang, Z., Liao, Y., Gao, W., Lai, C., Wu, X., & Zeng, Z. (2024). Improving the explainability of CNN-LSTM-based flood prediction with integrating SHAP technique. Ecological Informatics, 84, 102904.
[22] Havas, C., & Resch, B. (2025). Fusion of geospatial information from remote sensing and social media to prioritise rapid response actions in case of floods. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07120-7.
[23] Phalguna Krishna, E. S., et al. (2023). Hybrid deep learning model with enhanced sunflower optimization for flood and earthquake detection. Heliyon, 9(10), e21172.
[24] Shi, W., et al. (2024). A critical review on multi-sensor and multi-platform remote sensing data fusion approaches. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 45, 1327–1402.
[25] Ghamisi, P., et al. (2019). Multisource and multitemporal data fusion in remote sensing: A comprehensive review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 7(1), 6–39.
[26] Abdalzaher, M. S., Krichen, M., Yiltas-Kaplan, D., Ben Dhaou, I., & Adoni, W. Y. H. (2023). Early Detection of Earthquakes Using IoT and Cloud Infrastructure: A Survey. Sustainability, 15(15), 11713.
[27] Acosta, J. N., et al. (2022). Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review. npj Digital Medicine, 5, 171.
[28] Chen, Y., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and multimodal data fusion for smart healthcare: Topic modeling and bibliometrics. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10712-7.
[29] Muniasamy, A. (2025). Revolutionizing health monitoring: Integrating transformer models with multi-head attention for precise human activity recognition using wearable devices. Technology and Health Care, 33, 1064.
[30] Rashid, M., et al. (2025). AI-driven wearable health devices with health-aware control and secure prognostics. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 99, 107012.
[31] Chen, Y., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and multimodal data fusion for smart healthcare: Topic modeling and bibliometrics. Artificial Intelligence Review, 57, 204.
[32] Gao, X., et al. (2025). Multimodal data fusion-based risk assessment models and clinical decision support systems for intraoperative acquired pressure injuries. Gavin Publishers: Journal of Clinical and Medical Images, 8(1), 1–12.
[33] Armesto, L. M., Alonso, T. R., Magalhães, D. S. F., & dos Santos, L. (2026). Algorithm-Based Selection of MRI Images to Support Medical Education and Cognitive Skill Development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 21(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v21i02.59207.
[34] Liu, G., et al. (2023). A systematic review of data fusion techniques for optimized structural health monitoring. Information Fusion, 93, 102136.
[35] Steinberg, A. N., Bowman, C. L., & White, F. E. (1999). Revisions to the JDL data fusion model. Proceedings of SPIE: Sensor Fusion: Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications III, 3719, 430–441.
[36] Dirgová Luptáková, I., Kubovčík, M., & Pospíchal, J. (2022). Wearable sensor-based human activity recognition with transformer model. Sensors, 22(5), 1911.
[37] Li, X., et al. (2025). IoT framework for sports activity safety monitoring based on wearable sensors and CRNN spatiotemporal analysis. Scientific Reports, 15, 9401.
[38] Ouared, A., May, M., Piau-Toffolon, C., & Dugué, N. (2025). Aligning Educational Stakeholder Perceptions of Learner Profiling with Explainable AI. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 20(4), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v20i04.55861.
[39] Addor, N., Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., & Clark, M. P. (2017). The CAMELS data set: Catchment attributes and meteorology for large-sample studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(10), 5293–5313.
[40] Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2016). MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific Data, 3, 160035.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 S. Sindhu, S. Srividhya, V. Rajaram, K. Suresh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

