TaskFlow: A DevOps-Oriented Task Management System for Software Development Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/itdaf.v3i4.59213Keywords:
Task Management System, Software Development Productivity, Real-Time Collaboration ToolsAbstract
Effective task management is critical to productivity and organizational success, especially in software development settings where an organization is required to handle a lot of tasks, deadlines, and collaborations. The existing offerings, including Trellis, GitHub, and Microsoft Teams, are fragmented solutions, lacking an easy integration with version control tools, realtime collaborative solutions, and DevOps processes. In order to address these gaps, this paper introduces TaskFlow, a task management system oriented at DevOps, which is intended to ease the creation, assignment, tracking, and deployment of tasks in a single platform. TaskFlow is coded into Dart and Flutter and relies on cross-platform support and adds automated tests (e.g., Selenium) and CI/CD pipelines to ensure quality and efficiency. The system provides end-to-end reporting, version control, and real-time collaboration through modular architecture, ensuring that a gap between the development and operations is bridged. Task Flow is found to be better than existing tools in automation, DevOps integration, and cross-platform compatibility. According to the system evaluation findings, it will lead to a 35–40 percent reduction in manual labor, a 50 percent reduction in post-deployment faults, and improved team coordination. In spite of the fact that the system is better in terms of task automation and integration, the system features added by users include in-built chat and better role management. TaskFlow is a user-friendly and scalable software solution that fits well in the current software teams, collaborating with DevOps to enhance productivity and deliver projects.
References
[1] M. Shahin, M. A. Babar, and L. Zhu, “Continuous integration, delivery and deployment: A systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and practices,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 3909–3943, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685629.
[2] X. Wang, T. Räty, and A. Mäkilä, “Test automation process improvement in DevOps: A case study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.04321, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.04321.
[3] E. Alégroth, R. Feldt, and N. Kolstrup, “Maintenance of automated GUI tests: An empirical analysis of industrial cases,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 122, pp. 1–15, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.070.
[4] R. Mohan and L. Ben Othmane, “Improving CI/CD pipelines using containerized test environments,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2020. [Online]. Available: Google Scholar search “Improving CI/CD pipelines using containerized test environments.”
[5] J. Mudadi and H. Lotriet, “Challenges in DevOps adoption: A South African case study,” S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 130–142, 2023, doi: 10.7166/34-1-2799.
[6] L. Pando and R. Dávila, “A systematic mapping study on software testing in DevOps,” Proc. Inst. Syst. Program. RAS, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 112–124, 2023, doi: 10.15514/ISPRAS-2023-35(2)-7.
[7] M. Keshavarz and A. M. Rahmani, “An AI-based architecture for intelligent DevOps pipeline automation,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 148, pp. 453–466, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2023.07.024.
[8] N. Hasani, “TestOps: Integrating testing lifecycle management into DevOps pipelines,” Softw. Qual. Prof., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 55–67, 2024. [Online]. Available: Google Scholar search “TestOps Integrating testing lifecycle management into DevOps pipelines.”
[9] N. Azad, R. Eramo, et al., “DevOps critical success factors: A systematic literature review,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 162, p. 107180, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107180.
[10] R. Eramo, J. Cabot, and M. Wimmer, “An architecture for model-based and intelligent automation,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 210, p. 111728, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.111728.
[11] T. Väänänen, Flutter in Cross-Platform Development: Tools, Performance, and Optimization, Univ. of Oulu Repository, 2025.
[12] A. Farmanesh, Developing a Cross-Platform Mobile Application for Health Data Integration and Capture from Multi Devices Using Flutter, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2024.
[13] C. Zhou, Challenges and Solutions in Cross-Platform Mobile Development: A Qualitative Study of Flutter and React Native, Aalto Univ., 2024.
[14] K. Pfaffen, Development and Validation of Automated Tests for a Multiplatform Flutter Application, HES-SO Univ. of Applied Sciences, Switzerland, 2024.
[15] A. Jain, “Scalable frameworks for cross-platform mobile app development,” J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. (JETIR), 2025.
[16] E. Afrihyia, A. U. Umana, and M. Appoh, “Enhancing software reliability through automated testing strategies and frameworks in cross-platform digital application environments,” Front. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, 2022.
[17] A. M. Sattar, P. Soni, M. K. Ranjan, and A. Kumar, “Open source developments: Accelerating cross-platform development with Flutter framework,” ResearchGate, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Raheel Riaz, Fadia Bibi, Sidra Tahir, Ahthasham Sajid, Sabitha Banu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
