The Nexus of AI Ethics, Mobile Learning, and Sustainable Development Goals in Higher Education: The Mediating Role of Law-Compliant Strategies

Svetlana Zemlyak; Galina Khromenkova; Olga Gusarova

doi:10.3991/ijim.v20i09.61493

Authors

Svetlana Zemlyak Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Galina Khromenkova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-5682
Olga Gusarova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7707-2318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i09.61493

Keywords:

AI Ethics, Mobile Learning, Sustainable Development Goals, Law-Compliant Strategy, Technology Readiness, Higher Education

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships among perceived AI ethical concerns, mobile learning adoption, law-compliant strategy, and integration of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in higher education, with technology readiness as a moderating variable. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was administered to 370 university students experienced with artificial intelligence (AI)-based educational tools and mobile learning platforms. Data analysis employed SPSS and partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Results indicated that perceived AI ethical concerns (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) and mobile learning adoption (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) significantly influenced law-compliant strategy, which strongly predicted SDG integration (β = 0.48, p < 0.001). Law-compliant strategy mediated the relationship between ethical concerns and sustainability outcomes (β = 0.20, p < 0.001). The direct effect of technology readiness on sustainability was not significant (β = 0.09, p = 0.072), and law-compliant strategy did not mediate the mobile learning sustainability relationship (β = 0.08, p = 0.110). Technology readiness significantly moderated the relationship between law-compliant strategy and sustainability (β = 0.14, p < 0.001). The model accounted for 46% of the variance in SDG integration. These findings highlight the need for robust, law-compliant governance frameworks to translate ethical awareness and technology adoption into sustainable development outcomes. The study demonstrates that law-compliant strategies are essential mechanisms linking ethics-aware AI systems and mobile learning to sustainable development.

References

[1] L. Li, J. Zhang, Z. Guo, and Y. Wang, “The mobile gamification for early literacy: An analysis of learning outcomes and engagement,” Journal of Advances in Humanities Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–17, 2024. https://doi.org/10.56868/jadhur.v3i4.234

[2] M. Fundira, E. I. Edoun, A. Pradhan, and C. Mbohwa, “Assessing digital competencies and AI ethics awareness among customers in the banking sector,” African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 792–807, 2024. https://journals.co.za/journal/aa.ajstid

[3] S. Chiodo, “Ethics-aware application of digital technologies in the construction,” in Improving Technology Through Ethics, p. 49, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52962-7

[4] T. Georgiev and E. Georgieva, “Artificial intelligence in mobile learning: Applications, benefits, and challenges,” in Proc. International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature, Jul. 2025, pp. 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98565-2_14

[5] S. R. Sohag, S. M. M. Pasha, and M. M. Ali, “Advanced approaches to achieve adaptive ethical and AI-driven human-centric software engineering,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Modern Science and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 19–31, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14942964

[6] D. Kim and Y. Ko, “Development and validation of an ethical awareness scale for AI technology,” Journal of Digital Convergence, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–86, 2022.

[7] G. Zvereva, J. Hamari, H. Pirkkalainen, and N. Xi, “Gamification for ethics literacy,” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 291–331, 2026. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48853593

[8] S. Sholla, R. N. Mir, and M. A. Chishti, “Towards the design of ethics aware systems for the internet of things,” China Communications, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 239–252, 2020. https://doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2020.02.019

[9] O. Akhigbe, D. Amyot, and G. Richards, “A systematic literature mapping of goal and non-goal modelling methods for legal and regulatory compliance,” Requirements Engineering, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 459–481, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-0294-1

[10] A. C. Atmaca, S. A. Kıray, and M. Pehlivan, “Development of a measurement tool for sustainable development awareness,” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2019. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.518099

[11] I. Celik, I. Sahin, and M. Aydin, “Reliability and validity study of the mobile learning adoption scale developed based on the diffusion of innovations theory,” Online Submission, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 300–316, 2014.

[12] H. Z. Baloch, A. Abdul Rahman, and N. A. Ihad, “Mobile collaborative informal learning design: Study of collaborative effectiveness using activity theory,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 34–41, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v6i3.2090

[13] G. Al Farsi, “The efficiency of UTAUT2 model in predicting student’s acceptance of using virtual reality technology,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 17–27, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i12.36951

[14] L. Terán, J. Pincay, I. Wallimann-Helmer, and E. Portmann, “A literature review on digital ethics from a humanistic and sustainable perspective,” in Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 57–64, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494295

[15] T. Anthuvan, S. Prabhuram, S. Rathi, and K. Maheshwari, “LXA v1.0: A framework to embrace agentic AI in mobile learning for Industry 5.0 readiness,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 19, no. 23, pp. 25–38, 2025, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5741482

[16] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425–478, 2003. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540