Mobile Learning Analytics for Data Science-Driven Cognitive Skill Development in Computer Science Engineering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i10.61589Keywords:
mobile learning analytics, cognitive skill development, data science in education, learning analytics, educational data mining, XGBoost, self-regulated learning, at-risk prediction, engineering education, quasi-experimental designAbstract
The current CSE curriculum must cater to the rising interest in data science competencies, which requires teaching and learning models that structurally strengthen higher-order cognitive skills. In this paper, we propose a data science–orientated mobile learning analytics (MLA) framework that aims to support undergraduate CSE students in developing critical thinking, problem-solving, analytical reasoning, self-regulated learning, and knowledge retention skills through empirical validation. Using a purpose-built mobile learning platform, the 16-week quasiexperimental study engaged 120 undergraduate students (experimental group: n = 62; control group: n = 58) and extracted multimodal learner data including interaction logs, formative assessment records, behavioural engagement metrics and self-regulatory survey information. Techniques from learning analytics, including statistical inference and machine learning–based predictive modelling, were used to analyse learner trajectories and identify at-risk students. Independent-samples t-tests showed statistically significant improvements in the experimental group on all five dimensions of cognition (p < .001), with Cohen’s d effect sizes between 0.97 and 1.19 reflecting large practical significance. A gradient boosting classifier based on XGBoost attained a learning accuracy of 89.2% (AUC–ROC = 0.931) in identifying at-risk learners and allowed for timely personalised interventions, resulting in an early intervention success rate of 72.7% among flagged learners who managed to cross above the risk threshold by midsemester. This paper proposes an MLA framework to create a scalable pedagogy that provides coherence between Bloom’s revised taxonomy, Zimmermann’s model of self-regulated learning (SRL) and the SAMR model. The findings substantively advance the empirical knowledge base for data science–enabled engineering education and provide evidence-based guidance to inform curriculum designers and educators who implement learner-centred, analytically augmented pedagogical strategies in data-intensive computing programmes.
References
[1] ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022–2023. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/
[2] L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, Eds., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Educational Objectives. New York, NY, USA: Longman, 2001
[3] K. E. Arnold and M. D. Pistilli, “Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '12), 2012, pp. 267–270. doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330666.
[4] R. S. Baker and K. Yacef, “The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions,” J. Educational Data Mining, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2009. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3554657.
[5] Zhang, Y. (2024). Machine Learning-Based Personalized Learning Path Decision-Making Method on Intelligent Education Platforms. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(16), pp. 68–82. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i16.51009
[6] B. S. Bloom, Ed., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I Cognitive Domain. New York, NY, USA: McKay, 1956.
[7] Svetlana Zemlyak, Irina Nozdreva, & Svetlana Sivakova. (2024). Implementation of AI in Smart Logistics Based on Mobile Technologies. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(17), pp. 88–100. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i17.50735
[8] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
[9] J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
[10] H. Crompton, “A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education,” in Handbook of Mobile Learning, Z. L. Berge and L. Y. Muilenburg, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2013, pp. 3–14.
[11] H. Crompton and D. Burke, “The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review,” Computers & Education, vol. 123, pp. 53–64, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007.
[12] M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Row, 1990.
[13] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. doi: 10.2307/249008.
[14] B. Muruganantham, Hezerul Abdul Karim, & Sarina Binti Mansor. (2024). Mobile Health Service Adoption: Reducing the Digital Gap and Age’s Moderating Influence. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(17), pp. 139–153. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i17.50741.
[15] F. Faul et al., “G Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 2007. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.
[16] Yang, L. (2024). Quality Optimizing Teaching Decisions in Flipped Classrooms Through Data-Driven Strategies. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(16), pp. 38–53. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i16.51005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Srividhya S., Ranjani M., Rajesh Kumar K., Praveenkumar R., Ramakrishnan P.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

