Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in STEM Education in Asia: A Bibliometric Review (2015–2026)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i11.61217Keywords:
Virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality, STEM education, Asia, Bibliometric analysis, ScopusAbstract
The use of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality (VAMR) technologies in various domains has increased over recent years. However, reviews of their application in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, particularly in Asia, remain limited. This study presents a bibliometric review of VAMR research in STEM education in Asia from 2015 to 2026 to map research trends, intellectual structures, and knowledge development in this field. A total of 122 publications were retrieved from the Scopus database. RStudio Bibliometrix and VOSviewer were employed to perform a bibliometric analysis. The findings indicate a steady growth of VAMR research in STEM education among Asian countries over the past decade. Taiwan, China, and Turkey emerged as the most influential countries in terms of citation output. Nanyang Technological University and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia were identified as the most productive institutions with 7 publications each. Electronics (Switzerland) was the most influential journal in the field with 266 citations. The most influential article, authored by AlGerafi et al., received 237 citations. Keyword co-occurrence analysis highlighted “augmented reality,” “STEM education,” “STEM,” “virtual reality,” and “systematic review” as dominant themes, reflecting the central focus of current research. This study offers a comprehensive overview of VAMR research in the context of STEM education in Asia and provides a basis for identifying emerging trends and future research directions.
References
[1] N. Behnamnia, A. Kamsin, M. A. B. Ismail, and S. A. Hayati, “Relationship between creative thinking and outcomes in a digital STEM-based learning environment: A mixed methods case study,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 57, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101816.
[2] I. Govender, “Digital literacy and STEM skills–What is the connection? A systematic review,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., pp. 1–22, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10758-025-09879-x.
[3] I. Irwanto, A. D. Saputro, W. Widiyanti, M. F. Ramadhan, and I. R. Lukman, “Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review of publications in selected journals,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 19–32, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i05.27003.
[4] X. Gu, D. Tong, P. Shi, Y. Zou, H. Yuan, and C. Chen, “Incorporating STEAM activities into creativity training in higher education,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 50, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101395.
[5] E. Hiğde and H. Aktamış, “The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 43, pp. 1–13, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000.
[6] A. T. Akcan, B. Yıldırım, A. R. Karataş, and M. Yılmaz, “Teachers’ views on the effect of STEM education on the labor market,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1184730.
[7] M. Andrée and L. Hansson, “Industrial actors and their rationales for engaging in STEM education,” J. Curric. Stud., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 551–576, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2019.1682055.
[8] X. Cao, H. Lu, Q. Wu, and Y. Hsu, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of STEM education on students learning outcomes,” Front. Psychol., vol. 16, pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579474.
[9] T. Roberts et al., “Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4.
[10] M. Ammar, N. J. Al-thani, and Z. Ahmad, “Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 9, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839.
[11] N. Pellas, I. Kazanidis, and G. Palaigeorgiou, “A systematic literature review of mixed reality environments in K-12 education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, pp. 2481–2520, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10076-4.
[12] F. Pallavicini and P. Anesa, “A narrative review on augmented reality in education,” Educ. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2026, doi: 10.3390/educsci16020261.
[13] H. T. Crogman, V. D. Cano, E. Pacheco, R. B. Sonawane, and R. Boroon, “Virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in experiential learning: Transforming educational paradigms,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030303.
[14] M. A. Kuhail, A. Elsayary, S. Farooq, and A. Alghamdi, “Exploring immersive learning experiences: A survey,” Informatics, vol. 9, p. 1032, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ informatics9040075.
[15] R. Arifiani and I. Irwanto, “Augmented reality integrated with mobile learning in chemistry education: A bibliometric analysis from 2012–2022,” J. Educ. Online, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.9743/JEO.2024.21.2.14.
[16] V. Anesti and I. Irwanto, “Research on augmented reality in education: A bibliometric analysis,” J. Learn. Dev., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 125–141, 2025, doi: 10.56059/jl4d.v12i1.1314.
[17] S. Angra, S. Jangra, Y. Gulzar, B. Sharma, G. Singh, and C. W. Onn, “Twenty-two years of advancements in augmented and virtual reality: A bibliometric and systematic review,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2025.1470038.
[18] X. Guo, Y. Guo, and Y. Liu, “The development of extended reality in education: Inspiration from the research literature,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 24, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132413776.
[19] E. C. Magaña, A. C. Ariza, J. R. Palmero, and F. D. Guillén‑Gámez, “Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality in the University environment: An analysis of scientific production,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 14, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44322-025-00027-y.
[20] K. E. Elfaki and E. M. Ahmed, “Digital technology adoption and globalization innovation implications on Asian Pacific green sustainable economic growth,” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 10, pp. 1–10, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100221.
[21] M. Jemala, “Long-term research on technology innovation in the form of new technology patents,” Int. J. Innov. Stud., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 148–160, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2021.09.002.
[22] J. Loh, W. H. Chong, C. Lim-ratnam, M. Tan, and P. Ow, “Educational evaluation research in Asia: A scoping review,” Asia Pacific J. Educ., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 552–568, 2024, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2024.2390663.
[23] T. Tene, J. Alexandra, M. Tixi, M. Salazar, C. V. Gomez, and S. Bellucci, “Integrating immersive technologies with STEM education: A systematic review,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1410163.
[24] M. J. Maas and J. M. Hughes, “Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 231–249, 2020, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737210.
[25] O. Çavdar and B. Yıldırım, “Mixed, augmented and virtual reality in STEM education in the context of text mining: A bibliometric map analysis and systematic review,” Int. J. Curric. Instr., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2108–2131, 2023.
[26] K. Alhazzaa and W. Yan, “Bridging the gap between theory and practice: AR and VR for building thermal behavior in architectural education,” Energy Build., vol. 343, pp. 1–13, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115940.
[27] J. Y. Wong, A. B. Azam, Q. Cao, L. Huang, Y. Xie, and I. Winkler, “Evaluations of virtual and augmented reality technology-enhanced learning for higher education,” Electronics, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13081549.
[28] C. Kefalis, C. Skordoulis, and A. Drigas, “Digital simulations in STEM education: Insights from recent empirical studies, a systematic review,” Encyclopedia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia5010010.
[29] J. C. Chen, H. C. Lin, K. Y. Lin, C. Y. Lin, and H. S. Hsiao, “Developing a hands‐on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 46–60, 2019, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12389.
[30] Y.-S. Chang, J.-Y. Kao, and Y.-Y. Wang, “Influences of virtual reality on design creativity and design thinking,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 46, p. 101127, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101127.
[31] T. Huang, C. Chen, and C. Tseng, “Exploring learning effectiveness of integrating mixed reality in educational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 234, pp. 1–25, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105327.
[32] M. A. Alnuaimi and M. A. Awad, “VR environment support for STEM students – A case study,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2527168.
[33] H.-C. Hung, M.-Y. Chuang, and C.-H. Chen, “Development and evaluation of collaboration scripts for long-distance VR team collaboration and co-creation in elementary STEM learning,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 59–80, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10763-024-10470-6.
[34] Z. Jin, Y. Bai, W. Song, Q. Yu, X. Yue, and X. Jia, “DVRT: Design and evaluation of a virtual reality drone programming teaching system,” Comput. Graph., vol. 125, pp. 1–17, 2024.
[35] I. Irwanto, S. E. Sinarintyas, U. Cahyana, and G. A. B. Widana, “Using immersive virtual reality to enhance students’ design thinking disposition and academic achievement,” Cogent Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2026, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2026.2616848.
[36] M. A. AlGerafi, Y. Zhou, M. Oubibi, and T. T. Wijaya, “Unlocking the potential: A comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 18, pp. 1–29, 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics12183953.
[37] M. S. Dogru, F. Yüzbasioglu, and I. Arpaci, “A bibliometric trend analysis of augmented reality in STEM education,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1933–1948, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2025.2483387.
[38] R. Hidayat and Y. Wardat, “A systematic review of augmented reality in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 9257–9282, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-12157-x.
[39] Y. Wen, “Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement: Designing classroom-based collaborative learning activities for young language learners,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 69, pp. 843–860, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-020-09893-z.
[40] S. Syskowski, S. Wilfinger, and J. Huwer, “Impact and classification of augmented reality in science experiments in teaching—A review,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1–20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14070760.
[41] M. Adnan, L. F. Md Ibharim, Y. S. Wong, I.- van Yee, and Sukirman, “Development and usability of a traditional game simulation module with augmented reality technology (AR-SiGaSTEM) in online learning to strengthen STEM skills among students,” LUMAT Int. J. Math, Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.31129/LUMAT.12.4.2226.
[42] B. Çeken and N. Taşkın, “Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 9, pp. 1–22, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2.
[43] M. Sırakaya and D. A. Sırakaya, “Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1556–1569, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713.
[44] I. Lasica, M. Meletiou-mavrotheris, and K. Katzis, “Augmented reality in lower secondary education: A teacher professional development program in Cyprus and Greece,” Educ. Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: 10.3390/educsci10040121.
[45] T. T. N. Anh, “Enhancing astronomy skills: The role of mobile augmented reality in Vietnamese middle schools,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 174–189, 2024, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v18i22.51997.
[46] I. Irwanto, L. Zeral, and I. Saputra, “The effect of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ critical thinking disposition and academic achievement,” J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2026, doi: 10.3926/jotse.3607.
[47] Y. Hsu, Y. Lin, and B. Yang, “Impact of augmented reality lessons on students ’ STEM interest,” Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z.
[48] P. Milgramt and F. Kishinott, “A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Syst., vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 1321–1329, 1994, [Online]. Available: https://cs.gmu.edu/~zduric/cs499/Readings/r76JBo-Milgram_IEICE_1994.pdf
[49] S. Pérez-Muñoz, R. Castaño Calle, P. T. Morales Campo, and A. Rodríguez-Cayetano, “A systematic review of the use and effect of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in physical education,” Information, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15090582.
[50] S. Liu, P. Toreini, and A. Maedche, “Mixed reality learning systems with head-mounted displays in higher education: A systematic review,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., pp. 1–35, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10758-025-09912-z.
[51] I. Irwanto and E. Hutahaean, “Two decades of STEM education studies in higher education: A bibliometric analysis,” J. Turkish Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 451–467, 2025, doi: 10.36681/tused.2025.023.
[52] K. Y. Lin, C. J. Ku, H. T. Wei, K. C. Yu, and P. J. Williams, “Processes, challenges, and teacher roles in developing and implementing collaborative STEM curricula: Case studies of two Taiwanese schools,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 12, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40594-025-00545-3.
[53] B. B. Lofgran, L. K. Smith, and E. F. Whiting, “Science self-efficacy and school transitions: Elementary school to middle school, middle school to high school,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 115, no. 7, pp. 366–376, 2015, doi: 10.1111/ssm.12139.
[54] A. M. Young et al., “Motivational decline and recovery in higher education STEM courses,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1016–1033, 2018, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1460773.
[55] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, pp. 285–296, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
[56] R. Pranckute, “Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world,” Publications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–59, 2021, doi: 10.3390/publications9010012.
[57] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and T. P. Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement,” PLoS Med., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1–6, 2009, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
[58] M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
[59] N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
[60] J. Wang, D. Guo, and M. Jou, “A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 49, pp. 658–669, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043.
[61] D. T. Nipo, J. Lily, S. Idris, S. Pinjaman, and I. Bujang, “The nexus between information and communication technology (ICT), electricity access, governance and human development: Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries,” Economies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/economies11020049.
[62] C. Aguayo, T. Cochrane, and V. Narayan, “Key themes in mobile learning: Prospects for learner-generated learning through AR and VR,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 27–40, 2017, doi: 10.14742/ajet.3671.
[63] C. Moro, Z. Stromberga, and A. Stirling, “Virtualisation devices for student learning: Comparison between desktop-based (Oculus Rift) and mobile-based (Gear VR) virtual reality in medical and health science education,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2017, doi: 10.14742/ajet.3840.
[64] G. M. Masilo, S. Simelane-Mnisi, A. Mji, and I. Mokgobu, “Students’ behavioural intention and challenges to bring your own device (BYOD) in higher education during COVID-19 and beyond,” World Trans. Eng. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2021.
[65] A. D. Samala, S. Papadakis, and S. Rawas, “Global insights into mobile learning in higher education: A PRISMA-guided bibliometric analysis from 2007 to 2023,” Int. J. Educ. Reform, pp. 1–31, 2025, doi: 10.1177/10567879251341869.
[66] D. W. Aksnes, L. Langfeldt, and P. Wouters, “Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories,” SAGE Open, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019829575.
[67] J. Wang, R. Frietsch, and R. Hooi, “International collaboration leading to high citations: Global impact or home country effect?,” J. Informetr., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2024.101565.
[68] A. Gómez-espés, M. Färber, and A. Jatowt, “Benefits of international collaboration in computer science: A case study of China, the European Union, and the United States,” Scientometrics, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 1155–1171, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04902-3.
[69] J. C. Wang, C. Hsieh, T. Tsai, and S. Chung, “Utilization of government grants for funding: Insights into STEM education teachers in Taiwan,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2530904.
[70] Y. Peng, F. Zhao, and Y. Zheng, “Promoting equitable and high-quality STEM education in China from an ecological perspective,” Discip. Interdiscip. Sci. Educ. Res., vol. 7, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s43031-025-00127-x.
[71] P. Dorta-González and M. I. Dorta-González, “Citation differences across research funding and access modalities,” J. Acad. Librariansh., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102734.
[72] NTU, “NIE sets up a STEM Education Research Centre,” 2018. https://www.ntu.edu.sg/nie/news-events/news/detail/nie-sets-up-a-stem-education-research-centre (accessed Feb. 12, 2026).
[73] Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation, “Future of STEM talent in Malaysia: A delphi approach,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/storage/2026/01/Appendices-STI-Foresight-Report-2025-2040-Future-of-STEM-Talent-in-Malaysia-A-Delphi-Approach.pdf
[74] R. Schmidt and B. Stumpe, “Systematic review of mobile augmented reality applications in geography education,” Rev. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 2025, doi: 10.1002/rev3.70042.
[75] A. J. Lotka, “The frequency distribution of scientific productivity,” J. Washingt. Acad. Sci., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 317–323, 1926.
[76] J. E. Hirsch, “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., vol. 102, no. 46, pp. 16569–16572, 2005, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
[77] H. Piwowar et al., “The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles,” PeerJ, vol. 6, pp. 1–23, 2018, doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375.
[78] S. C. Bradford, “Sources of information on scientific subjects,” Engineering, vol. 137, pp. 85–86, 1934.
[79] M. Mendoza, “Differences in citation patterns across areas, article types and age groups of researchers,” Publications, vol. 9, pp. 1–23, 2021, doi: 10.3390/publications9040047.
[80] R. Miranda and E. Garcia-Carpintero, “Overcitation and overrepresentation of review papers in the most cited papers,” J. Informetr., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1015–1030, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.08.006.
[81] X. Chen, D. Zou, H. Xie, and F. L. Wang, “Metaverse in education: Contributors, cooperations, and research themes,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1111–1129, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3277952.
[82] G. D. Boztaş, M. Berigel, F. Altınay, and Z. Altınay, “Learning modalities shaped by digital transformation in distance education: A bibliometric analysis of trends and reflections (2017–2023),” Open Prax., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 349–362, 2025, doi: 10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.837.
[83] F. Mufit, W. S. Dewi, S. Riyasni, and M. Dhanil, “Augmented reality with a cognitive conflict model and STEM integration on Newton’s universal law of gravitation: Does practicing practical learning support scientific literacy?,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 255–271, 2025, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.2.2239.
[84] S. Rehman, R. Khatoon, and I. A. Khan, “Unlocking the potential of AI-enhanced mixed reality: Enhancing technical English proficiency for engineering students in the Gulf Region,” Arab World English J., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 185–195, 2025, doi: 10.24093/awej/vol16no4.10.
[85] K. Ragab, E. Martínez-Jiménez, and E. Fernandez-Ahumada, “Students’ perceptions of using interactive technology in developing their competencies in STEM classes in an applied technology school in the UAE,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 24, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: 10.28945/5631.
[86] H. H. Mira, R. Chaker, I. Maria, and H. Nady, “Review of research on the outcomes of embodied and collaborative learning in STEM in higher education with immersive technologies,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 37, pp. 1161–1198, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s12528-024-09418-0.
[87] I. Irwanto, T. Lintangnicita, U. Cahyana, and J. Cha, “Examining the effect of immersive virtual reality on 11th-grade students’ creative thinking disposition and academic achievement,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, pp. 1–16, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00880-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irwanto Irwanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

