Mobile Technologies in English Language Education: A PRISMA-Guided Bibliometric Mapping of WoS-Indexed Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i17.61267Keywords:
mobile technologies , English language education , bibliometric analysis , thematic evolution , technology acceptanceAbstract
Mobile technologies are reshaping English language education, transforming traditional language teaching and learning through greater flexibility, accessibility, and interactivity. In this study, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of 264 peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2025 in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection, following PRISMA guidelines. By examining publication trends, citation impact, keyword networks, and thematic evolution, our research maps the intellectual structure and developmental trajectory of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) research in English language education. The findings reveal a steady increase in research output and influence, although scholarly contributions are concentrated within a limited number of journals, institutions, and countries. Four major thematic clusters are identified: learning performance; technology acceptance and instructional design; mobilemediated interaction and feedback; and speaking and pronunciation development. Over time, the literature shows an increasing movement from application-oriented studies toward theorydriven adoption frameworks, alongside growing attention to intelligent support systems. Building on these insights, this study proposes a bibliometric-based conceptual synthesis of interaction-oriented MALL, showing how literature brings together technological affordances, learner-internal processes, and interactional dynamics in mobile language learning contexts.
References
[1] W.-C. V. Wu, I.-T. D. Lin, M. W. Marek, and F.-C. Ou Yang, “Analysis of English idiomatic learning behaviors of an audio-visual mobile application,” Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–17, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016899
[2] A. Rahmani, V. Asadi, and I. Xodabande, “Using mobile devices for vocabulary learning outside the classroom: improving the English as foreign language learners’ knowledge of high-frequency words,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, p. 899885, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899885
[3] K. T. C. Chen, “Speech-to-text recognition in university English as a foreign language learning,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 9857–9875, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11016-5
[4] Y. Bai, “A mixed methods investigation of mobile-based language learning on EFL students’ listening, speaking, foreign language enjoyment, and anxiety,” Sage Open, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255554
[5] Z. Quan, L. Grant, and D. Hocking, “Comparing concordances of language patterns and words by ESL intermediate learners: A preliminary experiment with two mobile concordancers,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 37, no. 5–6, pp. 1421–1447, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2081581
[6] C. Chen, N. Jamiat, and S. Du, “Effect of a self-regulated vocabulary learning mobile application on EFL students’ vocabulary learning achievement and motivation,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 25–37, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i16.49755
[7] A. Tlili, S. Salha, J. Garzón, M. Denden, Kinshuk, S. Affouneh, and D. Burgos, “Which pedagogical approaches are more effective in mobile learning? A meta-analysis and research synthesis,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1321–1346, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12950
[8] H.-T. Hsu and C.-C. Lin, “Factors influencing students’ listening learning performance in mobile vocabulary-assisted listening learning: An extended technology acceptance model,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1511–1525, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12969
[9] A. Mashhadi, M. A. Hussein, and A. K. Fahad, “Mobile learning for teacher professional development: An empirical assessment of an extended technology acceptance model,” Porta Linguarum, no. 2023c, pp. 349–369, 2023. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi2023c.29658
[10] M. M. Lakulu, A. S. Izkair, M. F. Abdul Muttalib, and N. A. Zainuddin, “Understanding AI and mobile learning adoption in Malaysian universities: A UTAUT-based model,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 80–111, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i11.52977
[11] N. A. Dahri, W. M. Al-Rahmi, K. A. Alhashmi, and F. Bashir, “Enhancing mobile learning with AI-powered chatbots: Investigating ChatGPT’s impact on student engagement and academic performance,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 17–38, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i11.54643
[12] M. Mingyan, N. Noordin, and A. B. Razali, “Improving EFL speaking performance among undergraduate students with an AI-powered mobile app in after-class assignments: An empirical investigation,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, p. 370, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04688-0
[13] P. Guo, J. J. Jeyaraj, and A. B. Razali, “A systematic review of collaborative mobile-assisted language learning (C-MALL) practices using bibliometric, content, and scientometric analyses,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, p. 1435, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03940-3
[14] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 133, pp. 285–296, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
[15] W. Wider, L. Jiang, J. Lin, M. A. Fauzi, J. Li, and C. K. Chan, “Metaverse chronicles: a bibliometric analysis of its evolving landscape,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no. 17, pp. 4873–4886, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2227825
[16] T. Karakose, S. Papadakis, T. Tülübaş, and H. Polat, “Understanding the intellectual structure and evolution of distributed leadership in schools: A science mapping-based bibliometric analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 16779, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416779
[17] L. S. Pek, F. S. C. Yob, R. W. M. Mee, W. Wider, M. Z. Miftah, and J. S. Camara, “Mobile gaming in education: A bibliometric analysis of trends and performance,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 2676, 2025. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.32991
[18] A. D. Samala, S. Papadakis, and S. Rawas, “Global insights into mobile learning in higher education: A PRISMA-guided bibliometric analysis from 2007 to 2023,” International Journal of Educational Reform, vol. 34, pp. 1–31, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879251341869
[19] M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[20] Y.-T. Sung, K.-E. Chang, and T.-C. Liu, “The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis,” Computers & Education, vol. 94, pp. 252–275, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
[21] R. Shadiev, W.-Y. Hwang, and Y.-M. Huang, “Review of research on mobile language learning in authentic environments,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 30, no. 3–4, pp. 284–303, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1308383
[22] T. Y. Ahn and S.-M. Lee, “User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 47, pp. 778–786, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12354
[23] L. Hsu, “Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1287–1297, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024
[24] R. Dashtestani, “Moving bravely towards mobile learning: Iranian students’ use of mobile devices for learning English as a foreign language,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 815–832, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1069360
[25] Z. Chen, W. Chen, J. Jia, and H. An, “The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: A meta-analysis,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1769–1789, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5
[26] M.-H. Hsu, P.-S. Chen, and C.-S. Yu, “Proposing a task-oriented chatbot system for EFL learners speaking practice,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 4297–4308, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1960864
[27] H.-T. Hsu and C.-C. Lin, “Extending the technology acceptance model of college learners’ mobile-assisted language learning by incorporating psychological constructs,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 286–306, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13165
[28] B. Klímová, “Mobile phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1091–1099, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9655-5
[29] Y. Dai and Z. Wu, “Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: A mixed-methods study,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 36, no. 5–6, pp. 861–884, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1952272
[30] D. Zhang, S. Hennessy, and P. Pérez-Paredes, “An investigation of Chinese EFL learners’ acceptance of mobile dictionaries in English language learning,” Computer Assisted Language Learning, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 317–341, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2189915
[31] Y. Wang, J. Wu, F. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Li, and L. Wang, “Empirical assessment of AI-powered tools for vocabulary acquisition in EFL instruction,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 131892–131905, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3446657
[32] R. M. I. Khan, A. Ali, and A. Alouraini, “Mobile learning in education: Inevitable substitute during COVID-19 era,” Sage Open, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221132503
[33] F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[34] A. Lu et al., “The roles of mobile app perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in app-based Chinese and English learning flow and satisfaction,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 10349–10370, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11036-1
[35] H.-H. Cho, S.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Lan, and C.-F. Lai, “Leveraging human-centred AI in interactive English education for generating learning materials,” Enterprise Information Systems, vol. 19, no. 3–4, p. 2482772, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2025.2482772
[36] C. Peng, W. Gu, and L. Jiang, “Effects of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL)-delivered explicit metacognitive intervention on Chinese EFL students’ receptive skills and metacognitive awareness,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 41, no. 5, p. e70125, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70125
[37] A. Al-Abri, F. Ranjbaran Madiseh, and M. Morady Moghaddam, “Exploring learning-oriented assessment in enhancing students’ lexical fluency through MALL,” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00832-7
[38] Y. Yuan, J. Harun, B. Y. Wong, and L. Li, “Technology-driven framework for college English courses: If and how mobile-assisted collaborative language learning affects EFL student engagement,” Sage Open, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–21, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251329687
[39] J. Kic-Drgas, G. Seferoğlu, F. Kılıçkaya, and R. Pereira, “Polish, Portuguese, and Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL: A replication study,” ReCALL, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 143–159, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000058
[40] UNESCO, AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-Makers. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2021. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
[41] UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Paris, France: UNESCO, 2023. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bo Zhou, Seong Pek Lim, Nahdia Kabir, Peerla Prasantham, M. Zaini Miftah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

