Digital Pathways to Autonomy: Exploring Moodle-Based Activities in TEFL

Haya Fayyad Abuhussein; Tina Jaber Rafidi; Nariman Morrar; Andira Abdallah; Ejtiyad Abu Thabet

doi:10.3991/ijim.v20i18.62623

Authors

Haya Fayyad Abuhussein Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-3135
Tina Jaber Rafidi Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-2832
Nariman Morrar Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine
Andira Abdallah Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine
Ejtiyad Abu Thabet Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7438-7277

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v20i18.62623

Keywords:

EFL Learners, Autonomy, Moodle-Based Activities, EFL Learning Environments

Abstract

This study examined the role of technology in fostering learner autonomy in EFL classrooms compared to traditional teacher-centered methods. It specifically explored students’ perceptions of technology in promoting autonomy and teachers’ views on their role in supporting autonomous learning through technology. A mixed-method design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. A questionnaire was distributed to investigate the impact of technology on learners’ autonomy, while semi-structured interviews were conducted to capture learners’ experiences with Moodle-based activities and teachers’ perspectives on their role in fostering autonomy. Findings revealed that technology, particularly Moodle, significantly supports learner autonomy by providing flexibility, access to diverse resources, and opportunities for independent problem-solving. Learners expressed positive attitudes toward Moodle-based activities, preferring them over traditional approaches. Teachers emphasized their role as facilitators, guiding learners through structured tasks and providing scaffolding to promote self-directed learning. Overall, the study highlights the effectiveness of technology in enhancing learner autonomy and suggests practical implications for integrating Moodle and similar platforms into EFL teaching practices.

References

REFERENCES

1. Abdel Razeq, A. A. (2014). University EFL learners’ perceptions of their autonomous learning responsibilities and abilities. RELC Journal. fada.birzeit.edu

2. Abdelrazeq, A. (2018). Autonomous learning levels of students majoring in EFL and the role of their teachers in developing autonomous learning.

3. Albadry, H. F. A. (2018). Using mobile technology to foster autonomy among language learners (Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University).

4. Alkhatnai, M. (2011). Learning styles of EFL Saudi college-level students in online and traditional educational environments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

5. Alwasidi, A., & Alnaeem, L. (2022). EFL University Teachers' Beliefs about Learner Autonomy and the Effect of Online Learning Experience. English Language Teaching, 15(6), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n6p135

6. Alzubi, A. A. F. (2021). The role of mobile technologies in impacting learner autonomy in an EFL context: A systematic review. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 56–73.

7. Basri, F. (2023). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 270–285.

8. Benson, P. (2001). Autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman.

9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10. Carvalho, A. R., & Santos, C. (2021). The transformative role of peer learning projects in 21st century schools—Achievements from five Portuguese educational institutions. Education Sciences, 11(5), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050196

11. Chang, A., & Geary, D. (2015). Promoting the autonomy of L2 learners in Taiwan using self-assessment learning logs. Education Quarterly Reviews. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310734563

12. Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Jaramillo-Alcázar, Á., & Luján-Mora, S. (2021). Mobile learning technologies for education: Benefits and pending issues. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4111.

13. Crompton, H., Burke, D., Gregory, K. H., & Gräbe, C. (2016). The use of mobile learning in science: A systematic review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 149–160.

14. Dewi, K. A. P. (2020). An investigation of project based learning implemented by teachers in teaching English to young learners at Bali Kiddy School.

15. Duc, D. T. H., & Hang, V. T. T. (2024). Fostering Vietnamese EFL learners’ learner autonomy and reading comprehension ability through online platforms. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i4.5624

16. Ellis, G. (1994). The learner-centred classroom: A teacher’s guide to methodology and practice. Cambridge University Press.

17. Elvina, & Jureynolds, J. (2024, August). Enhance mobile learning in supporting learner autonomy in second language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 2024 3rd International Conference on Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT) (pp. 503–508). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT62134.2024.10701181

18. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

19. Ghanizadeh, A., Razavi, A., & Jahedizadeh, S. (2015). Technology-enhanced language learning (TELL): A review of resources and upshots. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, 54, 73–87.

20. Gulbinskienė, D., Masoodi, M., & Šliogerienė, J. (2017). Moodle as virtual learning environment in developing language skills, fostering metacognitive awareness and promoting learner autonomy. Pedagogika, 127(3), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2017.47

21. Gurung, R. K., Alsadoon, A., Prasad, P. W. C., & Elchouemi, A. (2016, July). Impacts of mobile cloud learning (MCL) on blended flexible learning (BFL). In 2016 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT) (pp. 108–114). IEEE.

22. Guzacheva, N. (2020). Zoom technology as an effective tool for distance learning in teaching English to medical students. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(5), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/54/61

23. Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2018). Analysis of the essential factors for the adoption of mobile learning in higher education: A case study of students of the University of Technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1053–1070.

24. Huang, J. (2020). Learner autonomy in the Chinese university classroom: An insider perspective on teacher–learner role relationships. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345436086

25. Jayanti, E. D. (2023, November 25–27). English teacher’s strategies to foster learner autonomy in online learning environment. In Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Education and E-Learning (ICEEL 2023) (pp. 73–78). ACM.

26. Khan, O., Ullah, Z., Bakht, I., & Bibi, S. (2024). Learners’ autonomy and mobile assisted language learning (MALL): Perceptions of undergraduate students. Panacea Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 3(1), 331–343. https://journals.airsd.org/index.php/pjll/article/view/455

27. Khoudri, I., & Zeriouh, M. (2023). Learner autonomy during COVID-19: The case of Moroccan EFL undergraduates. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 8(2), 139–156.

28. Kul, İ. (2023). The role of technology in fostering autonomous language learning. Contemporary Research in Language Learning Journal.

29. Lai, C. (2019). Learning beliefs and autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. Language Awareness, 28(4), 291–309.

30. Little, D. (2000). Autonomy and autonomous learners. In Routledge encyclopedia of language teaching and learning (pp. 69–72). Routledge.

31. Liu, H. J. (2015). Learner autonomy: The role of motivation in foreign language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1165.

32. Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Tu, J.-F. (2020). Multimedia technology and learner autonomy: An experimental study for asymmetric effects. Symmetry, 12(3), Article 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12030462

33. Mansooji, H., Ghaleshahzari, A., & Javid, M. (2022). EFL learner autonomy: Iranian university instructors’ beliefs vs. actual practices. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(1), Article n1.

34. Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, N. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9, Article e16348.

35. Morales, H. S., & Mena, R. G. (2020). The good, the bad and the unthinkable of learner autonomy in EFL. Letras, 67, 115–[page range not specified].

36. Mote, N. (2023). Role of technology in EFL students’ autonomy. Harvest: An International Multidisciplinary and Multilingual Research Journal, 3(Special Issue V).

37. Nguyen, M. N., & Trinh, T. H. (2023). Vietnamese tertiary students’ autonomy in learning English listening skills. VietTESOL International Convention Proceedings, 3. https://proceedings.viettesol.org.vn/index.php/vic/article/view/94

38. Nguyen, S. V., & Habók, A. (2021). Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire. Heliyon, 7(4), e06831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06831

39. Nitsche, K. (2013, July). Acceptance of mobile, classroom-bound e-learning systems from the perspective of students and lectures. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 508–509). IEEE.

40. Okumuş Ceylan, N. (2021). The relationship between learner autonomy and motivation. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(4), 150–159. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1313495.pdf

41. Oubadi, Y., & Lamkhanter, F. (2024). The role of web technologies in promoting learner autonomy among EFL university students. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(3), 343–356. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383621667

42. Pichugova, I. L., Stepura, S. N., & Pravosudov, M. (2016). Issues of promoting learner autonomy in EFL context. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 28, p. 1081). EDP Sciences.

43. Pratolo, B. W., & Solikhati, H. A. (2021). Investigating teachers’ attitude toward digital literacy in EFL classroom. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.15747

44. Pratiwi, D. I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Autonomous learning and the use of digital technologies in online English classrooms in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), Article ep423. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13094

45. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6.

46. Priyadarshini, D. I., Sasikanth, J. W., & George, M. H. (2023). Application of technology in English language learning. International Journal of Future and Modern Research, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i06.9055

47. Qaddumi, H. A., & Smith, M. (2024). Implementation of learning management systems (Moodle): Effects on students’ language acquisition and attitudes towards learning English as a foreign language. Trends in Higher Education, 3(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3020016

48. Qi, A. (2012). On the theoretical framework of autonomous learning. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 11, 35–40.

49. Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: an overview. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73–81.

50. Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for learner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 40–55.

51. Ritonga, M., Tazik, K., Omar, A., & Dehkordi, E. S. (2024). Enhancing Arabic language learning in higher education: Leveraging E-Campus as an online learning and evaluation platform. JIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32790.24640

52. Ruheili, A. (2024). Online learning evaluation (Kahoot!) as a motivational tool for students learning. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(8), 01–06.

53. Saeed, M. A. (2021). Learner autonomy: Learners’ perceptions on strategies to achieve autonomy in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.3.17

54. Sato, T., Murase, F., & Burden, T. (2020). An empirical study on vocabulary recall and learner autonomy through mobile-assisted language learning in blended learning settings. CALICO Journal, 37(3), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.40436

55. Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524.

56. Shapauov, A., Kabyken, M., Kozachek, A., Tikhonova, I., Kolganov, S., Kortunov, V., Bogatyreva, S., Livson, M., & Khodjaliev, S. (2023). Optimization of independent work in foreign language learning: Experience with using Moodle. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(6), 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.06

57. Siumarlata, V. (2024, June 7). Perceptions of autonomy. Teaching and Learning Network Blog. Retrieved from Teaching and Learning Network website.

58. Susanti, A., et al. (2023). Learner autonomy in online learning for EFL students during the pandemic. Cogent Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370216398

59. Tran, T. B. T., & Vuong, T. K. (2024). Mobile devices and autonomy in English language learning: A deeper look at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(3), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24439

60. Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Longman.

61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

62. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Prentice Hall.

63. Xiao, S. (2021). Self-efficacy, autonomy and the relationships towards English achievement. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education, Management and Social Science (ICEMSS 2021) (pp. 119–123). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210806.024

64. Yuzulia, I. (2020). EFL teachers’ perceptions and strategies in implementing learner autonomy. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(1), 36–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i1.2744

65. Zhang, D., & Goh, C. C. (2006). Strategy knowledge and perceived strategy use: Singaporean students’ awareness of listening and speaking strategies. Language Awareness, 15(3), 199–119.

66. Zhang, X. (2022). The importance of an autonomy-supportive workplace and engaged students for language teachers' self-determination and engagement. Journal of Pedagogical Linguistics and Language.

67. Zhou, Y., & Wei, M. (2018). Strategies in technology-enhanced language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 471–495.