Balancing Innovation and Integrity: Navigating the Challenges of Generative AI in Higher Education

Norman S. St. Clair; Pamela D. McCray

doi:10.3991/ijac.v19i1.58669

Authors

Norman S. St. Clair University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA
Pamela D. McCray University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3298-6000

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v19i1.58669

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), Higher education, Innovative assessment strategies, Academic integrity, Institutional support systems

Abstract

The rapid integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) tools in higher education has sparked a myriad of discussions, presenting both remarkable opportunities and significant challenges. The problem lies in the dual nature of GAI: while it holds immense potential to enhance learning experiences, foster deeper engagement, and enable personalized education, its misuse for academic dishonesty raises profound concerns regarding the integrity of assessments and the authenticity of student work. The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of GAI integration in higher education, focusing on the need to reimagine and reform assessment strategies, develop learning environments that promote the ethical use of AI, and implement institutional support systems to ensure that academic integrity remains intact. Our scope includes an examination of faculty perspectives on the pedagogical potential of GAI, the challenges of maintaining academic integrity, and innovative assessment strategies that can mitigate these risks. The central question addressed is how educators and institutions can balance the benefits of GAI with the need to uphold academic standards and integrity.

Author Biography

Pamela D. McCray, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX, USA

I am a highly accomplished professional with a Ph.D. in Organizational Leadership and Evaluation, as well as over two decades of executive leadership experience in the technology sector. This combination provides me with a strong foundation in both academic scholarship and practical industry knowledge. I bring a unique blend of advanced educational qualifications, particularly in HyFlex teaching and pedagogy, to support simultaneous student engagement across multiple modalities. I am well-versed in curriculum development and program evaluation and have contributed to the field through scholarly research, peer-reviewed publications, and national conference presentations.

References

[1] Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022

[2] Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

[3] Joshi, S. (2025). Comprehensive Review of AI Hallucinations: Impacts and Mitigation Strategies for Financial and Business Applications. International Journal of Computer Applications Technology and Research, 14, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.7753/IJCATR1406.1003.

[4] Hicks, M.T., Humphries, J., & Slater, J. (2024). ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics Inf Technol 26(38). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5

[5] Issa, T., and Hall, M. (2024). A teamwork framework for preventing breaches of academic integrity and improving students' collaborative skills in the AI era, Heliyon, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38759.

[6] Ito, T. & Umemoto, T. (2022), Self-Regulation, Co-Regulation, and Socially Shared Regulation of Motivation for Collaborative Activity: Comparison Between University Students and Working Adults1. Jpn Psychol Res, 64, 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12337

[7] Kaiser, K. (2009). Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632-1641. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309350879.

[8] Lodge, J., de Barba, P., & Broadbent, J. (2023). Learning with generative artificial intelligence within a network of co-regulation. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(7), 2. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.7.02

[9] Matthews, J. A., & Volpe, C. R. (2023). Academics' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated written outputs: A practical application of Turing's Imitation Game. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8896

[10] Mazeikiene, N., & Kasperiuniene, J. (2024). AI-Enhanced Qualitative Research: Insights from Adele Clarke's Situational Analysis of TED Talks. The Qualitative Report, 29(9), 2502-2526. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7652

[11] Morgan, D. L. (2023). Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: The Case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248

[12] Olohunfunmi, I. A., & Ahmad Zulfadhli Khairuddin, A. Z. (2024). Exploring Ethical Dilemmas of AI Generative Tools Among Higher Education Students: A Systematic Review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Computing, Engineering & Science Education (InvENT 2024), Advances in Computer Science Research, 117. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-589-8_24

[13] Pattyn, F. (2024). The value of generative AI for qualitative research: A pilot study. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems.

https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewjdsis42022964

[14] Perkins, M., & Roe, J. (2024). Generative AI tools in academic research: Applications and implications for qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06872

[15] Resnik, D.B., & Hosseini, M. (2024). The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: new guidance needed for a new tool. AI Ethics (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8

[16] Rulfi, V. L., & Spada, I. (2023). Guidelines for the use of generative AI in research paper writing. In Proceedings of the GENerative, Explainable and Reasonable Artificial Learning. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3571/short3.pdf

[17] Slotnick, R. C., & Boeing, J. Z. (2024). Enhancing qualitative research in higher education assessment through generative AI integration: A path toward meaningful insights and a cautionary tale. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20631

[18] Xie, Y., Wu, S., & Chakravarty, S. (2023). AI meets AI: Artificial intelligence and academic integrity—A survey on mitigating AI-assisted cheating in computing education. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3585059.3611449

[19] Yanamala, A. K. Y., & Suryadevara, S. (2024). Navigating data protection challenges in the era of artificial intelligence: A comprehensive review. Revista de Inteligencia Artificial en Medicina, 15(1), 113-146.

https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3926743

[20] Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.