Enhancing Educational Outcomes through the Integration of Virtual Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v21i01.59363Keywords:
Classroom Learning Environment (CLE), Electronic Learning Environment (ELE), Virtual Learning Environment (VLE), Virtual Reality, Educational Technology, Student EngagementAbstract
This study examines how classroom learning environments (CLE), electronic learning environments (ELE), and virtual learning environments (VLE) compare in supporting Kuwait’s evolving education system. A quantitative comparative design surveyed 200 stakeholders (students, instructors, administrators, and parents) with a bilingual, six-dimension instrument (value, engagement, knowledge, psychomotor, attitudes, and assessment) analyzed through descriptive statistics and paired-samples t-tests. Findings show VLEs significantly enhanced knowledge acquisition (t(111) = 11.11, p < .001; +13.02) and were rated higher in overall value (38% vs. CLE’s 24%). CLE, however, was superior for attitude building (t(111) = −20.71, p < .001; −17.62) and slightly for psychomotor skills (t(111) = −2.22, p = .028; −1.54). Engagement remained stronger in CLE overall, though VLEs demonstrated clear gains in learner-content and instructor interaction. Assessment was viewed as more reliable in CLE (47% vs. VLE 40%). ELE consistently underperformed across dimensions. These results suggest that while VLEs cannot fully replace the strengths of CLE in shaping attitudes and skills, they provide clear advantages in knowledge retention and perceived value. A blended model that leverages VLE innovations while retaining CLE’s interpersonal and practical benefits appears to be the most effective path for Kuwait’s educational reform.
References
[1] M. Casini, “Extended reality for smart building operation and maintenance: A Review,” MDPI, https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3785 (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
[2] Huang KT;Ball C;Francis J;Ratan R;Boumis J;Fordham J;, “Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications,” Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30657334/ (accessed Sep. 30, 2025).
[3] L. Caprara and C. Caprara, “Effects of virtual learning environments: A scoping review of literature,”Education and information technologies, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492824/ (accessed Sep. 30, 2025).
[4] C. Weng, R. Chu, S. M. Christianto, and S. Otanga, “Enhancing students’ biology learning by using augmented reality as a learning supplement - Cathy Weng, Sarah Otanga, Samuel Michael Christianto, Regina Ju-Chun Chu, 2020,” Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0735633119884213 (accessed Sep. 30, 2025).
[5] Dedi Rohendi, Muhammad Oka Ramadhan, Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim, Hutkemri Zulnaidi, Enhancing student’s interactivity and responses in learning geometry by using augmented reality, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15796
[6] [1] P. Steele, C. Burleigh, M. Kroposki, M. Magabo, and L. Bailey, “Ethical considerations in designing virtual and augmented reality products—virtual and augmented reality design with students in mind: Designers’ perceptions - Patricia Steele, Cheryl Burleigh, Margaret Kroposki, Myrene Magabo, Liston Bailey, 2020,” Sage Journals, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0047239520933858 (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
[7] N. I. Lestari and D. Rosana, “Augmented reality based on Learning Assessment,” Atlantis Press, https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/isse-20/125954810 (accessed Oct. 10, 2025).
[8] S. Limbu, “Fostering peer evaluation and cognitive, affective, and psychomotor (CAP) domains in school level science education: A critical reflection on the STEAM approach,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 446–472, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427037.pdf (accessed Oct. 13, 2025). [files.eric.ed.gov].
[9] K. A. M. Sanusi, D. Iren, N. Fanchamps, M. Geisen, and R. Klemke, “Virtual virtuoso: A systematic literature review of immersive learning environments for psychomotor skill development,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 73, pp. 909–949, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-025-10449-2 (accessed Oct. 13, 2025).
[10] Juan Garzón, Eddy Patiño and Camilo Marulanda, Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Trends, Benefits, and Challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 9(8), 84, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti9080084
[11] Punit Dubey and Vandana Kanaskar, The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Education Research: Current Trends & Future Prospects, Journal of Research & Method in Education, Volume 15, Issue 3 Series 2, Pages 28-40, 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anwar Alwaalan, Paul Manuel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.