From Metaverse Myth to Augmentiverse Reality
AR Smart Glasses and Standards-Led Convergence for Interoperability and Spatial Computing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v21i01.59733Keywords:
Augmentiverse, Metaverse, Augmented Reality (AR), AR Smart Glasses, Interoperability Standards, OpenXR and WebXR, Decentralized Identity (DID), Verifiable Credentials (VCs), Edge computing for AR, Spatial computingAbstract
This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current state and near-term trajectory of augmented and immersive ecosystems, synthesizing progress across key dimensions of interoperability, identity, and hardware innovation. The analysis extends the “Augmentiverse” framework—an Augmented Reality (AR)-first, standards-aligned precursor to a broader Metaverse—by integrating tangible, real-world developments in AR smart glasses and head-mounted displays. It further situates these developments within the emerging paradigm of spatial computing, where digital content is persistently anchored to physical environments through shared standards and environmental understanding. The study examines how cross-industry coordination across XR runtimes (OpenXR, WebXR), 3D asset/scene interchange (glTF, OpenUSD via AOUSD), decentralized identity (W3C DIDs and Verifiable Credentials 2.0), immersive media (OMAF), and future network capabilities (IMT-2030) provides the essential foundation for a persistent, interoperable digital layer. Evidence from major technology firms including Meta’s strategic hardware ladder (Ray-Ban Meta Glasses, Oakley Meta HSTN, Meta Ray-Ban Display Glasses, and Orion) and the broader competitive landscape featuring Apple, Samsung, and Microsoft demonstrates that a pragmatic, staged approach is the most viable path to population-scale adoption. The central contribution of this research is a detailed, standards-first roadmap that operationalizes this vision, explaining how the convergence of lightweight, socially acceptable eyewear with robust open standards reduces fragmentation, strengthens user trust, and creates immediate economic value, thereby paving a realistic path toward deeper immersion as foundational technologies mature.
References
References
[1] A. Küsters, “A tale of two metaverses: Assessing the eu's influence on standard-setting in virtual worlds,” Interactive Entertainment Law Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 83-96, 2024, doi: 10.4337/ielr.2024.02.03.
[2] M. Traub and M. Weinberger, “Apis in the metaverse-a systematic evaluation,” Virtual Worlds, vol. 3, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.3390/virtualworlds3020008.
[3] C. E. Brinckerhoff, “Study on standardization for interoperable metaverse,” presented at the Int. Conf. Adv. Commun. Technol. (ICACT), 2023, doi: 10.23919/icact56868.2023.10079642.
[4] X. Zhang et al., “Development of Polarization Volume Hologram Waveguide for Augmented Reality Smart Glasses,” Sid's Digest Tech. Papers, 2024, doi: 10.1002/sdtp.17746.
[5] Apple, “Apple Vision Pro brings a new era of spatial computing to business,” Apple Newsroom, Sept. 8, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2024/04/apple-vision-pro-brings-a-new-era-of-spatial-computing-to-business/.
[6] Google, “Google announces Samsung XR headset will launch later this year,” SamMobile, Sept. 8, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sammobile.com/news/samsung-xr-headset-launch-timeline-announced-google-io-2025/.
[7] Samsung Newsroom, “Introducing Galaxy XR: Opening new worlds,” Samsung Global Newsroom, Oct. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://news.samsung.com/global/introducing-galaxy-xr-opening-new-worlds
[8] F. Zhou, H. B. L. Duh, and M. Billinghurst, “Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR,” presented at the Int. Symp. Mixed Augment. Reality (ISMAR), 2008, doi: 10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637362.
[9] I. Hirskyj-Douglas et al., “Social AR: Reimagining and Interrogating the Role of Augmented Reality in Face to Face Social Interactions,” CSCW, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3406865.3418585.
[10] T. A. Hemphill, “The ‘metaverse’ and the challenge of responsible standards development,” J. Responsible Innovation, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23299460.2023.2243121.
[11] D. Mebrahtom, S. Hadish, A. Sbhatu, M. Aloqaily, and M. Guizani, “Establishing trust and security in decentralized metaverse: A web 3.0 approach,” ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput., Commun., Appl., 2024, doi: 10.1145/3696454.
[12] S. Ghirmai, D. Mebrahtom, M. Aloqaily, M. Guizani, and M. Debbah, “Self-sovereign identity for trust and interoperability in the metaverse,” arXiv.org, abs/2303.00422, 2023, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.00422.
[13] E. Bastug, M. Bennis, M. Medard, and M. Debbah, “Toward interconnected virtual reality: Opportunities, challenges, and enablers,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 110-117, June 2017, doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1601089.
[14] R. M. Albana’a and N. T. Alsohybe, “Optimizing Latency for Augmented Reality Applications via Mobile Edge Computing,” ICETI, 2024, doi: 10.1109/iceti63946.2024.10777191.
[15] K. Rao, G. Coviello, W. P. Hsiung, and S. Chakradhar, “ECO: EdgeCloud Optimization of 5G applications,” arXiv: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing, 2021.
[16] M. Yaakob, A. A. Salameh, and O. Mohamed, “Enabling Edge Computing in 5G for Mobile Augmented Reality,” Int. J. Interactive Mobile Technol., vol. 16, no. 14, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i14.32623.
[17] M. Chandrika and P. Gupta, “Ethical and Privacy Implications of Augmented Reality,” presented at the Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. Secur. Syst. (CSITSS), 2024, doi: 10.1109/csitss64042.2024.10816864.
[18] H. Regenbrecht, S. P. Zwanenburg, and T. Langlotz, “Pervasive Augmented Reality - Technology and Ethics,” IEEE Pervasive Comput., 2022, doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2022.3152993.
[19] M. Alkfairy, S. Alrabaee, and O. Alfandi, “Ethical Pathways in VR and the Metaverse: Frameworks for Responsible Innovation,” iMeta, 2024, doi: 10.1109/imeta62882.2024.10807903.
[20] O. I. Heimo et al., “Augmented reality: towards an ethical fantasy?,” presented at the Int. Symp. Ethics Eng. Comput. Sci. (ETHICS), 2014, doi: 10.1109/ETHICS.2014.6893423.
[21] S. A. R. Shirazi, R. Khan, N. Yousaf, and N. u. Sahar, “Issues, Challenges, and Solutions in Data Acquisition in Virtual and Augmented Reality Environments,” VFAST Trans. Softw. Eng., vol. 12, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.21015/vtse.v12i2.1849.
[22] B. Keeney and A. N. Patra, “Towards a Secured, Interoperable, and Ethical Metaverse,” presented at the IEEE SoutheastCon, 2024, doi: 10.1109/southeastcon52093.2024.10500220.
[23] V. Diyora and B. Khalil, “Impact of Augmented Reality on Cloud Data Security,” presented at the Int. Conf. Comput., Commun., Netw. Technol. (ICCCNT), 2024, doi: 10.1109/icccnt61001.2024.10725977.
[24] S. Kim, M. A. Nussbaum, and J. L. Gabbard, “Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health,” IIE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors, 2016, doi: 10.1080/21577323.2016.1214635.
[25] R. Laborde et al., “The interplay between policy and technology in metaverses: Towards seamless avatar interoperability using self-sovereign identity,” presented at the Int. Conf. Metaverses (METACOM), 2023, doi: 10.1109/metacom57706.2023.00080.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noureddine Elmqaddem

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.