Quality of Life of Engineering Educators in Vocational Education and Training

Implications for Vocational and Engineering Pedagogy

Authors

  • Tímea Šeben Zaťková Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-4846
  • Rastislav Bernát Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-6722
  • Zuzana Bernátová Regional Office for Spatial Planning and Construction Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
  • Zoltán Záležák Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v16i6.62496

Keywords:

Engineering pedagogy, Quality of life, Engineering educators, Vocational education and training (VET), WHOQOL - BREF Questionnaire, Well-being

Abstract


The study examines the perceived quality of life (QOL) of educators with an engineering background working at different levels of schools using the standardized WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire (containing domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, environment, overall QOL, and general health). The study included 76 vocational education and training (VET) educators in Slovakia. Perceived QOL by VET teachers shed light on differences based on gender, age, and level of the school. The results show that teachers generally rate their psychological well-being and social relationships positively, while physical health and overall health received lower ratings, especially among older respondents. No statistically significant differences were found based on gender or school level. Age emerged as the only significant factor, particularly in the environmental domain. A statistically significant difference emerged, with the youngest generation perceiving the QOL more positively than the oldest generation. Beyond descriptive insights, the study highlights the relevance of teacher wellbeing as a critical factor influencing teaching effectiveness, innovation readiness, and the capacity to integrate technological and pedagogical advancements in engineering education. The results suggest that insufficient attention to teachers’ quality of life may limit their ability to adopt modern teaching approaches and respond to the increasing demands of digital and technology-enhanced learning environments. The study contributes to the field of engineering pedagogy by linking educator wellbeing with educational quality and proposes age-sensitive and system-level interventions aimed at supporting sustainable teaching performance in VET and engineering education contexts.

Author Biographies

Tímea Šeben Zaťková, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia

Tímea Šeben Zaťková is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Education, Faculty of Education, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia. She holds a PhD. degree in Pedagogy, and her research interests include engineering pedagogy, higher education pedagogy, and teacher education. (Email: timea.seben.zatkova@fedu.uniba.sk; tsebenzatkova@gmail.com).

Rastislav Bernát, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

Rastislav Bernát is a university lecturer and Head of the Department of Traffic Education and Services at the Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovakia. He obtained his PhD in Machinery and Mechanization of Agricultural Production. His main research interests include traffic education, engineering pedagogy, and the preparation of driving instructors and traffic educators. (Email: rastislav.bernat@uniag.sk).

Zuzana Bernátová, Regional Office for Spatial Planning and Construction Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

Zuzana Bernátová  obtained her engineering degree in Agricultural machinery, Faculty of Engineering at Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Subsequently, she was a student in Supplementary pedagogical studies under the supervision of T. Šeben Zaťková. She was keenly interested in the topic of teachers´  well-being, and her studies focused on integrating well-being principles into vocational education and teachers’ profession. Currently, she works at Regional Office for Spatial Planning and Construction Nitra, Slovakia. (Email: zuzana.bernatova@stavebnyurad.gov.sk).

Zoltán Záležák, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia

Zoltán Záležák is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Design and Engineering Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Slovakia. He holds an academic background in Machinery Reliability and Product Quality. His professional interests include engineering education, automotive technologies—with a particular focus on fuel efficiency and environmental standards—as well as the operation and activities of driving schools for motor vehicle driver training. (Email: zoltan.zalezak@uniag.sk).

 

References

[1] European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. “Teachers in Europe: Careers, Development and Well-being. Eurydice report.” Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. https://doi:10.2797/997402

[2] K.E. Rakow, M. Priestley, N.C. Byrom, et al. “Their wellbeing affects our wellbeing: student perspectives of lecturer wellbeing and its consequences for student wellbeing.” High Educ, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01365-0

[3] P. Avola, T. Soini-Ikonen, A. Jyrkiäinen, et al.. “Interventions to Teacher Well-Being and Burnout A Scoping Review.” Educ Psychol Rev 37, 11, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09986-2

[4] Teacher wellbeing Index Slovakia, 2021. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2026. [online]. Available: https://institutkonvalinka.sk/teacher-wellbeing-index-slovakia/

[5] OECD. “Results from TALIS 2024: The State of Teaching.” OECD Publishing, Paris, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1787/90df6235-en

[6] J. Daniel, L. E. Madigan, H. L. Kim, O. K. Glandorf. “Teacher burnout and physical health: A systematic review.” International Journal of Educational Research, Volume 119, 2023, 102173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102173

[7] C. Viac, P. Fraser. “Teachers´ Well-being: A Framework for Data Collection and Analysis. OECD Education Working Paper No. 213.” 2020, p. 81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/c36fc9d3-en

[8] Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic. “Vyhláška č. 173/2023 Z. z. o kvalifikačných predpokladoch pedagogických zamestnancov a odborných zamestnancov” [Decree of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic of April 28, 2023, on qualification prerequisites for pedagogical and professional employees]. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2026. [online]. Available: https://www.slov-lex.sk/pravne-predpisy/SK/ZZ/2023/173/

[9] M. Tyler, D. Dymock, A. H. Le. “Retaining teachers and trainers in vocational education and training (VET): motivating career-changers to remain as VET educators.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 29(2), 2024, pp. 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2024.2330782

[10] C. Jenkinson. “Quality of life.” Encyclopedia Britannica. 2025, October 3, Accessed: Jan. 14, 2026. [online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/topic/quality-of-life

[11] PS. Liao. “Perceived Quality of Life.” In Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Cham. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2129

[12] E. Řehulka, O. Řehulková. “Kategorie kvality života v psychologii zdraví.” [ Quality of life categories in health psychology] In E. Řehulka, a kol. Škola a zdraví 21. [School and Health 21]. Brno: Paido, 2006, pp. 579-590.

[13] K. Scheuch, E. Haufe, R. Seibt. “Teachers’ health.” Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 112 (20), 2015, p. 347.

[14] J. Šimíčková - Čížková. “Monitoring of teachers´ and teaching profession students´ quality of life.“ School and Health 21, 2011, 89-95.

[15] WHO. “WHOQOL: Measuring quality-of-life.” Geneva: Author. 1997.

[16] WHO. “WHOQOL. User Manual.” 1998. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2026. [online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-HSI-Rev.2012.03

[17] B. Hudnall Stamm. “Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Version 5 (ProQOL).” 2009-2012. Accessed: Jan. 14, 2026. [online]. Available: www.proqol.org.

[18] A. Lampropoulou. “Teachers’ professional quality of life, sense of self-efficacy and the moderating role of satisfaction with life.” Issues in Educational Research, 34(4), 2024, pp.1369-1387, http://www.iier.org.au/iier34/lampropoulou.pdf

[19] E. Diener, R. A. Emmons, R. J. Larsen, S. Griffin. “The Satisfaction with Life Scale.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 2010, pp. 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

[20] R. Walton, “Quality of Working Life: What is it?” Sloan Management Review. Cambridge Vol. 15, Iss. 1, (Fall 1973): 11.

[21] OECD. “OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being 2025 Update”. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1787/9203632a-en

[22] C. S. Stelmach, T. Stoltz. “Quality of Life and subjective well-being in higher education teachers: An Integrative Literature Review.” ARACÊ, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 3, 2025, pp. 15452–15468, https://doi.org/10.56238/arev7n3-303

[23] J. Broďáni, S. Lipárová. “Pohybová aktivita a kvalita života učiteľov materských a základných škôl” [Physical activity and quality of life of kindergarten and elementary school teachers]. In Aktuálne problémy telesnej výchovy a športu V. - Zborník vedeckých prác z medzinárodnej konferencie. [Current Issues in Physical Education and Sport V. Proceedings from an international conference]. Ružomberok: VERBUM – vydavateľstvo KU, pp. 7-16, 2016.

[24] J.C. Nwoko, T.I. Emeto, A.E.O. Malau-Aduli, B.S. Malau-Aduli. “A Systematic Review of the Factors That Influence Teachers' Occupational Wellbeing.” Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(12):6070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20126070

[25] C. C. M. Da Silva, A. B. d. Santos, I. C. Leoci, E. G. Leite, E. P. Antunes, W. Torres, E. D. d. L. Mesquita, L. D. Delfino, V. S. Beretta. “The Association between Perceived Stress, Quality of Life, and Level of Physical Activity in Public School Teachers.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(1), 88. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010088

[26] WHO. “WHOQOL-BREF: Slovenská verzia dotazníka kvality života” [WHOQOL-BREF: Slovak version of the quality-of-life questionnaire]. Ženeva: WHO. 1996. Available: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol/whoqol-bref/docs/default-source/publishing-policies/whoqol-bref/slovak-whoqol-bref

[27] A. Škoviera. “Burnout syndrome in teachers and its prevention. [Syndróm vyhorenia u učiteľov a jeho prevencia]. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského, 2015.

[28] L. Taylor, W. Zhou, L. Boyle, S. Funk, J-E. De Neve. “Wellbeing for schoolteachers.” International Baccalaureate Organization. 2024.

[29] M. Švecová. “Social support and stress management in the teaching profession.” [Sociálna opora a zvládanie stresu v učiteľskom povolaní]. Bratislava: VEDA, 2017.

[30] E. M. Kunz-Skrede, M. Molin, M. Tokovska. “So, we started to say hi to each other on campus. a qualitative study about well-being among PhD candidates in Norway.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 20(1). 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2474355

[31] J. B. Sedda, B. R. A. Sedda, Y. A. C. A. Vieira. “Survey of the Quality of Life and Well-Being of the Teachers of Marilândia-ES in the Daily School.” International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 8(11),2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.811.7

[32] M. Šimúthová. “Psychohygiena učiteľa: Riziká a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia.” [Teacher mental hygiene: Risks and prevention of burnout syndrome]. Trnava: Univerzita sv. Cyrila a Metoda, 2018.

[33] B. Patangia, A. Sathiyaseelan, S. M. A. Balasundaram, S. Chaudhury, N. Chaudhry, R. Jaiprakash, “Work-Cognition and Subjective Well-being Among Female Professional Educators During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moderating Role of Resilience.” Business Perspectives and Research. 2023.

[34] R. Kalousek. “Working environment and quality of life of university teachers.” [Pracovné prostredie a kvalita života učiteľov vysokých škôl]. Praha: Pedagogická fakulta UK, 2020.

[35] C. Carrasco-Aguilar, S. Ortiz-Mallegas, M. Martín-Civantos, A. Luzón. “The Engineer as a Teacher: Professional Teaching Identity of Engineers in Spain.” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 15(4), pp. 110–126. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v15i4.50987

[36] H.C. Peris-Ramos, M.C. Míguez, S. Rodriguez-Besteiro, S. David-Fernandez, V.J. Clemente-Suárez. “Gender-Based Differences in Psychological, Nutritional, Physical Activity, and Oral Health Factors Associated with Stress in Teachers.” Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024;21(4):385 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040385

[37] G. Fang, X. Zhou, Y. Xin, M. Li, F. Li, W. Zhang, B. Li, Y. Wang. “Mental Health of Primary and Secondary School Teachers in the Remote Mountain Areas.” Medicina, 2023. 59(5), 971. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59050971

[38] L. Janik Blaskova L. Winter. “Mapping teacher wellbeing in Slovakia: insights into resilience, relationships, and support needs.” Front. Educ. 10:1584696. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1584696

[39] SSI. “Stav zisťovania wellbeingu žiakov a učiteľov v školách [Wellbeing survey of students and teachers in schools]. In Správa o stave a úrovni výchovy a vzdelávania v školách a školských zariadeniach v SR v školskom roku 2021/2022” [Report on the state and level of education and training in schools and school facilities in the Slovak Republic in the school year 2021/2022]. 2022, pp. 223 – 232. [online]. Available: https://www.ssi.sk/wpcontent/uploads/12/2022/sprava_2022.pdf

[40] M. Saïd, S. Temam, S. Alexander, N. Billaudeau, M. Zins, S. Kab, M.N. Vercambre. “Teachers' Health: How General, Mental and Functional Health Indicators Compare to Other Employees? A Large French Population-Based Study.” Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(18):11724. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811724

[41] J. Šolcová, M. Tokovská, T. Šeben Zaťková. “Active education in older adults with use of smart technologies.” 2024. UMB: Banska Bystrica. https://doi.org/10.24040/2024.9788055721361

[42] A. Seberini, A. Kascakova, M. Tokovska, J. Solcova. “Age management implementation in the workplace: Trends, contributing factors, and implications for organizational performance.” E&M Economics and Management, 29(1), 2026, pp.100–114. https:// doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2026-1-007

Downloads

Published

2026-11-10

How to Cite

Šeben Zaťková, T., Bernát, R., Bernátová, Z., & Záležák, Z. (2026). Quality of Life of Engineering Educators in Vocational Education and Training: Implications for Vocational and Engineering Pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 16(6), pp. 125–142. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v16i6.62496

Issue

Section

Papers