Investigating Impacts of Socially Engaged Engineering and Design Case Studies in Undergraduate Engineering Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v16i6.63154Keywords:
case studies, sociotechnical thinkingAbstract
Engineering practice needs a sociotechnical skillset that integrates deep technical knowledge with the capacity to navigate complex social, contextual, and environmental dimensions. To address the traditional technocentric bias of undergraduate engineering curricula, the University of Michigan’s Center for Socially Engaged Engineering and Design (C-SED) developed and implemented a series of microhistorical “SEED” case studies. This study utilized a survey of 333 engineering students to investigate participant perceptions regarding the benefits, drawbacks, and skills developed through these educational experiences. Quantitative and qualitative findings demonstrate that a substantial majority of students recognized the real-world relevance of the material, reporting enhanced capabilities in identifying the social impacts of engineering decisions, mapping stakeholder perspectives, and evaluating system trade-offs. While the study revealed a small degree of resistance from students grappling with entrenched expectations of what constitutes “legitimate” engineering knowledge, the overall results demonstrate that integrated, well-supported case studies offer an effective curricular intervention to foster socially engaged engineering competencies across various disciplines.
References
[1] H. J. Passow and C. H. Passow, “What competencies should undergraduate engineering programs emphasize? A systematic review,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 475–526, 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20171.
[2] E. A. Reddy, M. S. Kleine, M. Parsons, and D. Nieusma, “Sociotechnical integration: What is it? Why do we need it? How do we do it?” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2023, doi: 10.18260/1-2--44239.
[3] H. K. Ro, D. Merson, L. R. Lattuca, and P. T. Terenzini, “Validity of the contextual competence scale for engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2015, doi: 10.1002/jee.20062.
[4] ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2022–2023 Accreditation Cycle. ABET, Inc., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2022-23-EAC-Criteria.pdf
[5] W. Faulkner, “Nuts and bolts and people: Gender-troubled engineering identities,” Social Studies of Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331–356, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25474523
[6] D. Nieusma and D. Riley, “Designs on development: Engineering, globalization, and social justice,” Engineering Studies, vol. 2, 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378621003604748.
[7] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J. Harrison, “Bringing in ‘the social’: Resisting and assisting social engagement in engineering education,” in 2018 World Engineering Education Forum–Global Engineering Deans Council, 2018, pp. 1–6.
[8] R. Williams, Retooling: A Historian Confronts Technological Change. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2002.
[9] S. Niles, S. Contreras, S. Roudbari, J. Kaminsky, and J. L. Harrison, “Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 491–507, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20323.
[10] E. A. Cech, “Culture of disengagement in engineering education?” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 42–72, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43671164
[11] A. Azapagic, S. Perdan, and D. Shallcross, “How much do engineering students know about sustainable development? The findings of an international survey and possible implications for the engineering curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2005.
[12] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students over time,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5.
[13] A. El-Zein, D. Airey, P. Bowden, and H. Clarkeburn, “Sustainability and ethics as decision-making paradigms in engineering curricula,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 170–182, 2008.
[14] J. J. R. Herkert, “Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 303–313, 2000, doi: 10.1080/03043790050200340.
[15] R. Adams, D. Evangelou, L. English, A. D. De Figueiredo, N. Mousoulides, A. L. Pawley, C. Schiefellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. M. Trenor, and D. M. Wilson, “Multiple perspectives on engaging future engineers,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 48–88, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x.
[16] S. A. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, A. M. Boll, J. Blacklock, and K. Johnson, “Pain and gain: Barriers and opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses,” in Proc. 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., Jun. 2019.
[17] E. A. Cech, “The misframing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 2013, pp. 67–84, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-6350-0_4.
[18] F. Ö. Karataş, G. M. Bodner, and S. Unal, “First-year engineering students’ views of the nature of engineering: Implications for engineering programmes,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2016, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2015.1012703.
[19] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, L. Paborsky, S. L. Hoffman, and S. J. Skerlos, “‘You could take social out of engineering and be just fine’: An exploration of engineering students’ beliefs about the social aspects of engineering work,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2021, doi: 10.18260/1-2--36539.
[20] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering context: A study of first-year engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2007, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00942.x.
[21] S. A. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, K. Johnson, J. Blacklock, and J. A. Leydens, “Exploring the nexus between students’ perceptions of sociotechnical thinking and construction of their engineering identities,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 2021, doi: 10.18260/1-2--37155.
[22] S. A. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, K. Johnson, J. Blacklock, and J. A. Leydens, “‘Not an engineer yet’: Manifestations of liminal engineering identities,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 2, 2023.
[23] P. Hancock and S. Turner, “Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum,” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: 10.24908/ijesjp.v9i2.15215.
[24] A. Ferdman and E. Ratti, “What do we teach to engineering students: Embedded ethics, morality, and politics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 30, no. 1, Art. no. 7, 2024.
[25] A. Colby and W. M. Sullivan, “Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 327–338, 2008.
[26] L. R. Lattuca, P. T. Terenzini, D. Knight, and H. K. Ro, 2020 Vision: Progress in Preparing the Engineer of the Future, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/107462
[27] M. Polmear, A. R. Bielefeldt, D. Knight, N. Canney, and C. Swan, “Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: A cultural comparison,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 866–881, 2019.
[28] S. D. Sheppard, A. Colby, K. Macatangay, and W. M. Sullivan, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
[29] J. Quesada, I. Calvo, J. Sancho, R. Sebastián, and M. Castro, “A design-oriented engineering course involving interactions with stakeholders,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 283–290, 2020.
[30] R. Tennant, J. Howcroft, and K. Mercer, “Enhancing experiential engineering education: Student and stakeholder perceptions of the biomedical stakeholder café for human-centered capstone design,” Biomedical Engineering Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 119–138, 2026.
[31] M. H. Forbes and G. D. Hoople, “The complexities and benefits of community-partnered projects for engineering capstone design students,” Trends in Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 291–305, 2023.
[32] J. L. Mueller, M. E. Dotson, J. Dietzel, J. Peters, G. Asturias, A. Cheatham, et al., “Using human-centered design to connect engineering concepts to Sustainable Development Goals,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 2, Art. no. n2, 2020.
[33] S. D. Jobe, M. Wilson-Fetrow, R. D. Lopez-Parra, P. Eisenman, E. Kapp, C. L. Abadam, V. Svihla, and A. Mulchandani, “The role of socio-technical design challenges in the early formation of civil engineers,” in Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2024.
[34] E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and S. J. Skerlos, “Investigating an asynchronous model for incorporating social aspects of engineering work into engineering design courses,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 798–810, 2023.
[35] M. R. Young, S. R. Daly, S. L. Hoffman, K. H. Sienko, and M. A. Gilleran, “Assessment of a novel learning block model for engineering design skill development: A case example for engineering design interviewing,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/27630
[36] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing needs in a cross-cultural design project: Student perspectives and challenges,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 712–731, 2020.
[37] J. W. Lee, S. R. Daly, V. Vadakumcherry, and G. Rodriguez, “Idea generation, development and selection: A study of mechanical engineering students’ natural approaches and the impact of hybrid learning blocks,” Design Science, vol. 9, Art. no. e29, 2023.
[38] E. Strehl, R. P. Loweth, and S. R. Daly, “Evaluation of a hybrid learning block model for engineering design interview skill building,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 10, no. 4, 2022.
[39] J. Lucena and J. Leydens, “From sacred cow to dairy cow: Challenges and opportunities in integrating social justice in engineering science courses,” in Proc. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24143.
[40] E. A. Reddy, B. Przestrzelski, S. M. Lord, and I. Khalil, “Introducing social relevance and global context into the introduction to heat transfer course,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--29640.
[41] S. M. Lord, B. Przestrzelski, and E. Reddy, “Teaching social responsibility in a circuits course,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--33354.
[42] L. A. Gelles and S. M. Lord, “Pedagogical considerations and challenges for sociotechnical integration within a materials science class,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1244–1260, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijee.ie/1atestissues/Vol37-5/09_ijee4102.pdf
[43] C. Davis and A. Yadav, “Case studies in engineering,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[44] D. A. Martin, E. Conlon, and B. Bowe, “Using case studies in engineering ethics education: The case for immersive scenarios through stakeholder engagement and real life data,” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 47–63, 2021, doi: 10.1080/22054952.2021.1914297.
[45] W. R. Wilson, “Using the Chernobyl incident to teach engineering ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 625–640, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4.
[46] J. Blizzard, L. Klotz, A. Pradhan, and M. Dukes, “Introducing whole-systems design to first-year engineering students with case studies,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 177–196, 2012, doi: 10.1108/14676371211211854.
[47] K. Emblen-Perry, “Auditing a case study: Enhancing case-based learning in education for sustainability,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 381, Art. no. 134944, 2022.
[48] K. Koopman, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, S. J. Skerlos, and S. M. Syal, “Insights and implications from a sociotechnical case study approach in sustainability education,” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 169–187, 2025.
[49] K. E. Nortz, L. K. Marlor, M. Zaheer, C. J. Finelli, and S. M. Lord, “Implementing a sociotechnical module on conflict minerals in a large ‘Introduction to Circuits’ course,” Education Sciences, vol. 15, no. 9, Art. no. 1243, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15091243.
[50] D. S. Özkan, A. Hira, and M. Friday, “Sociotechnical judgment in engineering education: Cases at the intersection of energy and society,” Education Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, Art. no. 458, 2026.
[51] J. Daraio and R. Dusseau, “Infrastructure education using the impacts of extreme storms as case studies,” Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering Faculty Scholarship, no. 60, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://rdw.rowan.edu/engineering_facpub/60
[52] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving, vol. 34. Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 1997.
[53] R. P. Harper, T. J. Weston, and E. Seymour, “Students’ perceptions of good STEM teaching,” in Talking About Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education, E. Seymour and A.-B. Hunter, Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019, pp. 245–276.
[54] S. Sheppard, K. Donaldson, H. Chen, G. Toye, M. Clark, L. Fleming, R. Miller, K. Smith, R. Stevens, and R. Streveler, Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey. Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, 2010.
[55] A. Gero, Y. Stav-Satuby, and N. Yamin, “Increasing motivation of engineering students: Combining ‘real world’ examples in a basic electric circuits course,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2460–2469, 2016.
[56] D. A. Chen, M. H. Forbes, G. D. Hoople, S. M. Lord, and J. A. Mejia, “The ‘who’ in engineering: Sociotechnical engineering as memorable and relevant,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 72–90, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v13i5.36571.
[57] D. S. Özkan, “Sociotechnical curricular approaches for a culture of engagement in engineering: Students navigating power and equity,” Engineering Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 56–81, 2026, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2025.2556386.
[58] D. Ozkan and C. Andrews, “Perspectives of seven minoritized students in a first-year course redesign toward sociotechnical engineering education,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.18260/1-2--41382.
[59] M. S. Reed, B. G. Merkle, E. J. Cook, C. Hafferty, A. P. Hejnowicz, R. Holliman, et al., “Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world,” Sustainability Science, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1481–1490, 2024.
[60] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[61] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015.
[62] A. M. McAlister, J. C. Garibay, L. Wheeler, and J. L. McDermott, “Undergraduate engineering students’ perspectives on the intersection of engineering identity, marginalized social identities, and identification with social justice,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 115, no. 1, Art. no. e70045, 2026.
[63] P. C. Brown, H. L. Roediger III, and M. A. McDaniel, Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
[64] R. B. Rodrigues and J. Seniuk Cicek, “A scoping literature review of sociotechnical thinking in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 807–833, 2024.
[65] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, and R. E. Mayer, How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Erika A. Mosyjowski, Shanna R. Daly

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
